Solano C, Galindo J, Sesma B, Alvarez M, Solsona M J, Gamazo C
Departmento de Microbiología, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
Vet Res. 2000 Sep-Oct;31(5):491-7. doi: 10.1051/vetres:2000135.
The specificity and sensitivity of indirect ELISA, based on the use of four different antigenic extracts obtained from a clinical isolate of Salmonella enteritidis, were compared with those obtained with the gm-flagellin based ELISA (IDEXX). A total of 116 serum samples from salmonellae free, naturally infected and vaccinated hens were studied. The results showed that the indirect ELISA, based on lipopolysaccharide (LPS), O-polysaccharide (PS) or membrane sediment (SD) antigens, enable the identification of a greater number of infected birds and discriminated field antibody responses from vaccinal ones better than the commercial IDEXX test. The indirect ELISA that used a O-polysaccharide rich fraction (PS) proved to be the most specific and sensitive test, suggesting that this indirect ELISA could be used to confirm IDEXX results, especially when the differentiation between vaccinated and infected poultry is required.
基于从肠炎沙门氏菌临床分离株获得的四种不同抗原提取物的间接酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)的特异性和敏感性,与基于鞭毛蛋白的ELISA(IDEXX)的特异性和敏感性进行了比较。共研究了来自无沙门氏菌、自然感染和接种疫苗母鸡的116份血清样本。结果表明,基于脂多糖(LPS)、O-多糖(PS)或膜沉淀物(SD)抗原的间接ELISA能够鉴定出更多受感染的禽类,并且比商业IDEXX检测更能区分野毒株抗体反应和疫苗诱导的抗体反应。使用富含O-多糖组分(PS)的间接ELISA被证明是最特异和最敏感的检测方法,这表明这种间接ELISA可用于确认IDEXX检测结果,特别是在需要区分接种疫苗和感染禽类的情况下。