Diujvestijn A M, Derhaag J G, van Breda Vriesman P J
Department of Internal Medicine, CARIM, University of Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Transpl Int. 2000;13(5):363-71. doi: 10.1007/s001470050715.
Classical complement activation is a major effector mechanism in the development of vascular lesions contributing to allograft rejection. We investigated complement activation by alloantibodies reactive with graft endothelial cell (EC) alloantigens in settings of MHC-mismatched and MHC-matched (non-MHC-mismatched) rat heart transplantation (Tx). Allosera and heart allografts were collected at the day of rejection (day 7-8 and day 28-35 in MHC-mismatched and non-MHC-mismatched Tx respectively) or earlier. Allosera reactivity was studied in vitro using rat-heart-endothelial-cell (RHEC) lines expressing the appropriate donor MHC and non-MHC alloantigen profile. Immunohistochemical analysis of rejected heart allografts showed deposition of alloantibodies in both MHC-mismatched and MHC-matched heart allografts, but expression of C3 was only seen in the vasculature of MHC-mismatched grafts. FACS analysis showed that anti MHC as well as anti non-MHC allosera were reactive with donor EC cell surface antigens. Both sera had similar IgG subclass profiles of anti-endothelial cell antibodies. Complement activation by anti MHC and anti non-MHC alloantibodies on EC was measured by FACS analysis of C3 and C5b-9 (MAC) expression. Distinct expression of C3 was noticed for EC incubated with anti-MHC allosera, but hardly for EC incubated with anti non-MHC allosera. C5b-9 was low but showed no difference between the two allosera. However, complement-mediated cytotoxicity experiments showed that functional (lytic) MAC was induced with anti MHC allosera but hardly with anti non-MHC allosera. Our data show that in settings of MHC-matched heart transplantation alloantibodies against endothelial non-MHC alloantigens are generated, but, in contrast to alloantibodies to MHC alloantigens, these alloantibodies have only poor complement-activating and lytic potentials. Whether anti non-MHC allolantibodies effect other biological processes relevant for heart allograft vasculopathy, including development of graft arteriosclerosis, needs further elucidation.
经典补体激活是导致同种异体移植排斥反应的血管病变发展过程中的一种主要效应机制。我们研究了在 MHC 不匹配和 MHC 匹配(非 MHC 不匹配)大鼠心脏移植(Tx)情况下,与移植内皮细胞(EC)同种异体抗原反应的同种抗体引起的补体激活。在排斥反应当天(MHC 不匹配和非 MHC 不匹配 Tx 分别为第 7 - 8 天和第 28 - 35 天)或更早收集同种血清和心脏同种异体移植物。使用表达适当供体 MHC 和非 MHC 同种异体抗原谱的大鼠心脏内皮细胞(RHEC)系在体外研究同种血清反应性。对排斥的心脏同种异体移植物进行免疫组织化学分析显示,同种抗体在 MHC 不匹配和 MHC 匹配的心脏同种异体移植物中均有沉积,但仅在 MHC 不匹配移植物的脉管系统中观察到 C3 的表达。流式细胞术分析表明,抗 MHC 以及抗非 MHC 同种血清与供体 EC 细胞表面抗原反应。两种血清具有相似的抗内皮细胞抗体 IgG 亚类谱。通过对 C3 和 C5b - 9(膜攻击复合物,MAC)表达的流式细胞术分析来测量抗 MHC 和抗非 MHC 同种抗体对 EC 的补体激活。在用抗 MHC 同种血清孵育的 EC 中观察到 C3 的明显表达,而在用抗非 MHC 同种血清孵育的 EC 中几乎未观察到。C5b - 9 水平较低,但两种同种血清之间无差异。然而,补体介导的细胞毒性实验表明,抗 MHC 同种血清可诱导功能性(溶细胞性)MAC,而抗非 MHC 同种血清几乎不能诱导。我们的数据表明,在 MHC 匹配的心脏移植情况下,会产生针对内皮非 MHC 同种异体抗原的同种抗体,但与针对 MHC 同种异体抗原的同种抗体相比,这些同种抗体的补体激活和溶细胞潜力较差。抗非 MHC 同种抗体是否影响与心脏同种异体移植血管病变相关的其他生物学过程,包括移植动脉硬化的发展,需要进一步阐明。