Small R, Lumley J, Donohue L, Potter A, Waldenström U
Centre for the Study of Mothers' and Children's Health, School of Public Health, La Trobe University, Carlton Vic 3053, Australia.
BMJ. 2000 Oct 28;321(7268):1043-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7268.1043.
To assess the effectiveness of a midwife led debriefing session during the postpartum hospital stay in reducing the prevalence of maternal depression at six months postpartum among women giving birth by caesarean section, forceps, or vacuum extraction.
Randomised controlled trial.
Large maternity teaching hospital in Melbourne, Australia.
1041 women who had given birth by caesarean section (n= 624) or with the use of forceps (n= 353) or vacuum extraction (n= 64).
Maternal depression (score >/=13 on the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale) and overall health status (comparison of mean scores on SF-36 subscales) measured by postal questionnaire at six months postpartum.
917 (88%) of the women recruited responded to the outcome questionnaire. More women allocated to debriefing scored as depressed six months after birth than women allocated to usual postpartum care (81 (17%) v 65 (14%)), although this difference was not significant (odds ratio=1.24, 95% confidence interval 0.87 to 1.77). They were also more likely to report that depression had been a problem for them since the birth, but the difference was not significant (123 (28%) v 94 (22%); odds ratio=1. 37, 1.00 to 1.86). Women allocated to debriefing had poorer health status on seven of the eight SF-36 subscales, although the difference was significant only for role functioning (emotional): mean scores 73.32 v 78.98, t= -2.31, 95% confidence interval -10.48 to -0.84).
Midwife led debriefing after operative birth is ineffective in reducing maternal morbidity at six months postpartum. The possibility that debriefing contributed to emotional health problems for some women cannot be excluded.
评估在产后住院期间由助产士主导的情况汇报会议对降低剖宫产、产钳助产或真空吸引助产的产妇产后6个月时产后抑郁患病率的效果。
随机对照试验。
澳大利亚墨尔本的一家大型产科教学医院。
1041名通过剖宫产(n = 624)、产钳助产(n = 353)或真空吸引助产(n = 64)分娩的女性。
产后6个月时通过邮寄问卷测量的产妇抑郁(爱丁堡产后抑郁量表得分≥13分)和总体健康状况(SF - 36分量表平均得分比较)。
招募的917名(88%)女性对结果问卷进行了回复。与分配到常规产后护理的女性相比,分配到情况汇报会议的女性在产后6个月时抑郁得分更高(81名(17%)对65名(14%)),尽管这种差异不显著(优势比 = 1.24,95%置信区间0.87至1.77)。她们也更有可能报告自分娩以来抑郁一直是她们的问题,但差异不显著(123名(28%)对94名(22%);优势比 = 1.37,1.00至1.86)。分配到情况汇报会议的女性在SF - 36量表的8个分量表中的7个上健康状况较差,尽管差异仅在角色功能(情绪)方面显著:平均得分73.32对78.98,t = -2.31,95%置信区间 -10.48至 -0.84)。
助产士主导的手术分娩后情况汇报会议在降低产后6个月时的产妇发病率方面无效。不能排除情况汇报会议对一些女性的情绪健康问题有影响的可能性。