Harrington R, Peters S, Green J, Byford S, Woods J, McGowan R
Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University of Manchester, Manchester M27 4HA, UK.
BMJ. 2000 Oct 28;321(7268):1047-50. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7268.1047.
To test the hypothesis that a community based intervention by secondary child and adolescent mental health services would be significantly more effective and less costly than a hospital based intervention.
Open study with two randomised parallel groups.
Two health districts in the north of England.
Parents of 3 to 10 year old children with behavioural disorder who had been referred to child and adolescent mental health services.
Parental education groups.
Parents' and teachers' reports of the child's behaviour, parental depression, parental criticism of the child, impact of the child's behaviour on the family.
141 subjects were randomised to community (n=72) or hospital (n=69) treatment. Primary outcome data were obtained on 115 (82%) cases a year later. Intention to treat analyses showed no significant differences between the community and hospital based groups on any of the outcome measures, or on costs. Parental depression was common and predicted the child's outcome.
Location of child mental health services may be less important than the range of services that they provide, which should include effective treatment for parents' mental health problems.
检验以下假设,即儿童和青少年二级心理健康服务进行的社区干预比医院干预显著更有效且成本更低。
有两个随机平行组的开放性研究。
英格兰北部的两个卫生区。
已被转介至儿童和青少年心理健康服务机构的3至10岁行为障碍儿童的父母。
家长教育小组。
家长和教师对儿童行为的报告、家长抑郁情况、家长对儿童的批评、儿童行为对家庭的影响。
141名受试者被随机分配至社区治疗组(n = 72)或医院治疗组(n = 69)。一年后,在115例(82%)病例中获取了主要结局数据。意向性分析显示,社区治疗组和医院治疗组在任何结局指标或成本方面均无显著差异。家长抑郁情况很常见,且可预测儿童的结局。
儿童心理健康服务的地点可能不如其提供的服务范围重要,服务范围应包括对家长心理健康问题的有效治疗。