Mundey M K, Ali A, Mason R, Wilson V G
School of Biomedical Sciences, The Medical School, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2UH.
Br J Pharmacol. 2000 Nov;131(5):893-902. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703659.
We have assessed the potential of several mu-opioid receptor antagonists to elicit a response in the guinea-pig isolated ileum in the presence of, and following overnight exposure to, morphine. Naloxone, D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH(2) (CTOP), (-)-5, 9alpha-diethyl-2-(3-furyl-methyl)-2'-hydroxy-6,7-benzomorphan (MR2266), but not D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-D-Trp-Arg-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH(2) (CTAP), produced a transient inhibition of electrically-evoked contractions of the guinea-pig ileum. The effect of 1 microM CTOP, but not that to MR2266, was inhibited by 1 microM somatostatin. Naloxone (0.3 microM), CTOP (3 microM), CTAP (3 microM) and MR2266 (0.3 microM) antagonized the inhibitory effect of morphine on electrically-evoked contractions of the guinea-pig to a similar degree and, following 60 min exposure to morphine, produced non-sustained contractions. The response to 3 microM CTOP was significantly smaller than that to 3 microM CTAP. None of the antagonists produced a response in the absence of morphine. Following overnight exposure of the ileum to 0.3 microM morphine (4 degrees C), and repeated washing to remove the agonist, all four antagonists elicited non-sustained contractions. However, the responses to 3 microM CTOP and 0.3 microM MR2266 were significantly smaller than those elicited by 0.3 microM naloxone and 3 microM CTAP. Somatostatin (1 microM) significantly reduced naloxone-induced contractions, but not those to CTAP. While all four mu-opioid antagonists elicited contractions in the presence of, and following prolonged exposure to, morphine, differences between them were noted which may be a consequence of non-opioid actions.
我们评估了几种μ-阿片受体拮抗剂在吗啡存在时以及过夜暴露于吗啡后,对豚鼠离体回肠产生反应的潜力。纳洛酮、D-苯丙氨酸-半胱氨酸-酪氨酸-D-色氨酸-鸟氨酸-苏氨酸-青霉胺-苏氨酸-NH₂(CTOP)、(-)-5,9α-二乙基-2-(3-呋喃基甲基)-2'-羟基-6,7-苯并吗啡烷(MR2266),但不是D-苯丙氨酸-半胱氨酸-酪氨酸-D-色氨酸-精氨酸-苏氨酸-青霉胺-苏氨酸-NH₂(CTAP),对豚鼠回肠的电诱发收缩产生了短暂抑制。1微摩尔CTOP的作用,而非MR2266的作用,被1微摩尔生长抑素抑制。纳洛酮(0.3微摩尔)、CTOP(3微摩尔)、CTAP(3微摩尔)和MR2266(0.3微摩尔)对吗啡对豚鼠电诱发收缩的抑制作用具有相似程度的拮抗作用,并且在暴露于吗啡60分钟后,产生了非持续性收缩。对3微摩尔CTOP的反应明显小于对3微摩尔CTAP的反应。在没有吗啡的情况下,这些拮抗剂均未产生反应。将回肠过夜暴露于0.3微摩尔吗啡(4℃),并反复冲洗以去除激动剂后,所有四种拮抗剂均引发了非持续性收缩。然而,对3微摩尔CTOP和0.3微摩尔MR2266的反应明显小于0.3微摩尔纳洛酮和3微摩尔CTAP所引发的反应。生长抑素(1微摩尔)显著降低了纳洛酮诱导的收缩,但未降低CTAP诱导的收缩。虽然所有四种μ-阿片拮抗剂在吗啡存在时以及长时间暴露于吗啡后均引发收缩,但注意到它们之间的差异,这可能是非阿片类作用的结果。