Holtom P E, Needham P L, Bennett G W, Aspley S
School of Biomedical Sciences, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH.
Br J Pharmacol. 2000 Nov;131(5):990-6. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0703653.
The present study compared high affinity neurotensin (NT) binding in rat brain following acute or chronic treatment with the classical antipsychotic, haloperidol, and the newer antipsychotic drugs, clozapine and zotepine. Drugs were given orally, as an acute treatment (1 dose) or chronically (21 day dosing) and binding to the NT high affinity receptor was examined in three brain regions; striatum, nucleus accumbens/olfactory tubercle and frontal cortex. Acute dosing with either vehicle, haloperidol, clozapine or zotepine produced no significant changes in NT binding from controls (naïve rats). Chronic (21 day) dosing resulted in an increase in the K:(D:) and B(max) of high affinity receptors in the striatum following haloperidol, but not clozapine, zotepine or vehicles. In contrast, the newer antipsychotics, clozapine and zotepine but not haloperidol or vehicles, significantly altered NT binding in the nucleus accumbens/olfactory tubercle by decreasing the K:(D:) and B(max). Further differentiation between the two newer antipsychotic drugs occurred in the frontal cortex. Clozapine had no significant effect on NT binding, whereas zotepine significantly reduced the K:(D:) of the high affinity receptor with no alteration in B(max). The antipsychotic drugs tested did not interact directly with the NT high affinity receptor. Therefore, they must be acting indirectly via an alternative receptor mechanism to alter NT high affinity binding. In accordance with previously reported NT/dopamine receptor interactions, this would suggest cross-talk between these systems. Overall, these data demonstrate that chronic, but not acute, administration of antipsychotic drugs alters NT binding in the rat brain. In addition, anatomical differences in NT binding arise according to the antipsychotic drug under test. This may be predictive of drug side-effect profile, antipsychotic efficacy or atypicality.
本研究比较了经典抗精神病药物氟哌啶醇以及新型抗精神病药物氯氮平和佐替平急性或慢性给药后大鼠脑中高亲和力神经降压素(NT)结合情况。药物通过口服给药,分为急性治疗(1剂)或慢性给药(21天给药),并在三个脑区检测NT高亲和力受体的结合情况,即纹状体、伏隔核/嗅结节和额叶皮质。用赋形剂、氟哌啶醇、氯氮平或佐替平急性给药后,与对照组(未用药大鼠)相比,NT结合无显著变化。慢性(21天)给药后,氟哌啶醇使纹状体中高亲和力受体的解离常数(K:D:)和最大结合容量(Bmax)增加,而氯氮平、佐替平或赋形剂则无此作用。相反,新型抗精神病药物氯氮平和佐替平而非氟哌啶醇或赋形剂,通过降低K:D:和Bmax显著改变了伏隔核/嗅结节中的NT结合。两种新型抗精神病药物在额叶皮质进一步表现出差异。氯氮平对NT结合无显著影响,而佐替平显著降低了高亲和力受体的K:D:,Bmax无变化。所测试的抗精神病药物不直接与NT高亲和力受体相互作用。因此,它们必定是通过替代受体机制间接发挥作用,从而改变NT高亲和力结合。根据先前报道的NT/多巴胺受体相互作用,这表明这些系统之间存在相互影响。总体而言,这些数据表明,抗精神病药物的慢性而非急性给药会改变大鼠脑中的NT结合。此外,根据所测试的抗精神病药物不同,NT结合存在解剖学差异。这可能预示着药物的副作用、抗精神病疗效或非典型性。