Mizes J S, Christiano B, Madison J, Post G, Seime R, Varnado P
West Virginia University School of Medicine, Morgantown, WV 26505, USA.
Int J Eat Disord. 2000 Dec;28(4):415-21. doi: 10.1002/1098-108x(200012)28:4<415::aid-eat9>3.0.co;2-z.
This project was designed to develop and test the psychometric properties and factor structure of a revision of the Mizes Anorectic Cognitions questionnaire (MAC). The goals of the revision were to improve the reliability and discriminant validity of the Weight and Approval subscale and to equalize the length of the three subscales. Also, the study compared the original MAC and the MAC-R in terms of their psychometric properties.
Twenty-four new items were developed for potential inclusion in the MAC-R, in addition to the original 33 items of the MAC. These items were administered to 205 eating disorder patients from five eating disorder clinics or programs, including inpatient, outpatient, and residential treatment settings that served diverse patient populations. Additionally, other measures of eating disorder constructs were administered to assess construct validity.
Factor analysis of the large pool of items and item reduction resulted in the final 24-item MAC-R, each subscale being eight items in length. Results showed that the MAC-R highly correlated with the MAC and other eating disorder questionnaires. Reliability of the MAC-R was improved over that of the MAC. Two subscales of the MAC-R discriminated among diagnostic groups, whereas the original MAC did not, indicating improved sensitivity of the revised scale.
The MAC-R appears to be an improvement over the original MAC. It provides useful information on the cognitions of eating-disordered patients and merits further investigation into its psychometric properties.
本项目旨在开发并测试米兹厌食认知问卷(MAC)修订版的心理测量特性和因子结构。修订的目标是提高体重和认可分量表的信度和区分效度,并使三个分量表的长度相等。此外,该研究还比较了原始MAC和MAC-R在心理测量特性方面的差异。
除了MAC原有的33个项目外,还开发了24个新项目以供纳入MAC-R。这些项目被施测于来自五个饮食失调诊所或项目的205名饮食失调患者,这些诊所或项目包括住院、门诊和住院治疗环境,服务于不同的患者群体。此外,还施测了其他饮食失调构念的测量工具以评估结构效度。
对大量项目进行因子分析和项目删减后,最终得到了24个项目的MAC-R,每个分量表长度为8个项目。结果表明,MAC-R与MAC及其他饮食失调问卷高度相关。MAC-R的信度比MAC有所提高。MAC-R的两个分量表能够区分不同诊断组,而原始MAC则不能,这表明修订后的量表敏感性有所提高。
MAC-R似乎是对原始MAC的改进。它提供了关于饮食失调患者认知的有用信息,值得对其心理测量特性进行进一步研究。