Suppr超能文献

老年人护理与服务的优先事项:一条没有指导方针的道路?

Priorities in care and services for elderly people: a path without guidelines?

作者信息

Bergmark A, Parker M G, Thorslund M

机构信息

Stockholm University, Sweden.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2000 Oct;26(5):312-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.5.312.

Abstract

The growing gap between demands and resources is putting immense pressure on all government spending in Sweden. The gap is especially apparent in care and services for elderly people in light of the rapid aging of the population. The article considers the decisions and priorities concerning resource allocation in the welfare sector in general and in elderly care in particular. The aim is to describe the political and administrative setting and to provide a conceptual structure that outlines the nature of the problem. Various levels of decision making are identified and discussed in the context of political accountability. Current transitions in elderly care are described with respect to service provision, marketisation, coverage rates, and eligibility standards. Basic principles of distribution are highlighted in order to clarify some central concepts of efficiency and justice, and a number of strategies for actual prioritising are identified. The article concludes with an endorsement of more conscious decisions in resource allocation. Existing knowledge and information concerning the effects of various strategies must be utilised, and the values and assumptions used for setting priorities must be made explicit.

摘要

需求与资源之间日益扩大的差距给瑞典政府的所有支出都带来了巨大压力。鉴于人口的迅速老龄化,这一差距在老年人护理和服务方面尤为明显。本文探讨了福利部门总体上以及老年人护理方面资源分配的决策和优先事项。目的是描述政治和行政背景,并提供一个勾勒问题本质的概念框架。在政治问责制的背景下,确定并讨论了不同层次的决策。从服务提供、市场化、覆盖率和资格标准等方面描述了老年人护理当前的转变。强调了分配的基本原则,以阐明效率和公平的一些核心概念,并确定了一些实际确定优先事项的策略。文章最后赞同在资源分配方面做出更审慎的决策。必须利用有关各种策略效果的现有知识和信息,并且用于确定优先事项的价值观和假设必须明确。

相似文献

1
Priorities in care and services for elderly people: a path without guidelines?
J Med Ethics. 2000 Oct;26(5):312-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.5.312.
2
The rationing debate. Rationing health care by age.
BMJ. 1997 Mar 15;314(7083):820-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7083.820.
3
Solidarity in Swedish welfare--standing the test of time?
Health Care Anal. 2000;8(4):395-411. doi: 10.1023/A:1026551420141.
4
Priority setting in health care: learning from international experience.
Health Policy. 1997 Oct;42(1):49-66. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8510(97)00054-7.
5
Redressing dis-advantage: promoting vertical equity within South Africa.
Health Care Anal. 2000;8(3):235-58. doi: 10.1023/A:1009483700049.
6
Rationing health care: from needs to markets? The politics of destruction: rationing in the UK health care market.
Health Care Anal. 1995 Nov;3(4):299-308; discussion 309-14. doi: 10.1007/BF02197076.
8
Setting health care priorities: Oregon's next steps.
Hastings Cent Rep. 1991 May-Jun;21(3):S1-10.
9
Obligation to the least well off in setting mental health service priorities: a consensus statement.
Psychiatr Serv. 1998 Oct;49(10):1273-4, 1290. doi: 10.1176/ps.49.10.1273.
10
Setting priorities, can Britain learn from Sweden?
BMJ. 1996 Mar 16;312(7032):691-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7032.691.

引用本文的文献

1
The association between leisure activity and mental health in the older adults in China: amazing Guangchangwu.
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 16;11:1291809. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1291809. eCollection 2023.
4
Processing Cycle Efficiency to Monitor the Performance of an Intelligent Tube Preparation System for Phlebotomy Services.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 6;18(17):9386. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179386.
5
Safeness and Treatment Mitigate the Effect of Loneliness on Satisfaction With Elderly Care.
Gerontologist. 2016 Oct;56(5):928-36. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnu170. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
6
Aging in Sweden: local variation, local control.
Gerontologist. 2014 Aug;54(4):525-32. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt124. Epub 2013 Oct 14.
8
Ethical challenges related to elder care. High level decision-makers' experiences.
BMC Med Ethics. 2007 Apr 10;8:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-8-3.
9
Life on the edge: patterns of formal and informal help to older adults in the United States and Sweden.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2005 Sep;60(5):S281-8. doi: 10.1093/geronb/60.5.s281.

本文引用的文献

1
Elderly care policy, formal and informal care. The Swedish case.
Health Policy. 1991 Aug;18(3):231-42. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(91)90024-r.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验