Bergmark A, Parker M G, Thorslund M
Stockholm University, Sweden.
J Med Ethics. 2000 Oct;26(5):312-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.26.5.312.
The growing gap between demands and resources is putting immense pressure on all government spending in Sweden. The gap is especially apparent in care and services for elderly people in light of the rapid aging of the population. The article considers the decisions and priorities concerning resource allocation in the welfare sector in general and in elderly care in particular. The aim is to describe the political and administrative setting and to provide a conceptual structure that outlines the nature of the problem. Various levels of decision making are identified and discussed in the context of political accountability. Current transitions in elderly care are described with respect to service provision, marketisation, coverage rates, and eligibility standards. Basic principles of distribution are highlighted in order to clarify some central concepts of efficiency and justice, and a number of strategies for actual prioritising are identified. The article concludes with an endorsement of more conscious decisions in resource allocation. Existing knowledge and information concerning the effects of various strategies must be utilised, and the values and assumptions used for setting priorities must be made explicit.
需求与资源之间日益扩大的差距给瑞典政府的所有支出都带来了巨大压力。鉴于人口的迅速老龄化,这一差距在老年人护理和服务方面尤为明显。本文探讨了福利部门总体上以及老年人护理方面资源分配的决策和优先事项。目的是描述政治和行政背景,并提供一个勾勒问题本质的概念框架。在政治问责制的背景下,确定并讨论了不同层次的决策。从服务提供、市场化、覆盖率和资格标准等方面描述了老年人护理当前的转变。强调了分配的基本原则,以阐明效率和公平的一些核心概念,并确定了一些实际确定优先事项的策略。文章最后赞同在资源分配方面做出更审慎的决策。必须利用有关各种策略效果的现有知识和信息,并且用于确定优先事项的价值观和假设必须明确。