Suppr超能文献

确定优先事项,英国能向瑞典学习吗?

Setting priorities, can Britain learn from Sweden?

作者信息

McKee M, Figueras J

机构信息

Health Services Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London.

出版信息

BMJ. 1996 Mar 16;312(7032):691-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7032.691.

Abstract

The Swedish government recently published a report on priorities in health care. It was written by a cross party group of politicians and drew extensively on the views of the public, health professionals, experience of earlier local exercises in priority setting, and research based evidence. It laid down an ethical framework for approaching issues of health care rationing. Underpinning the framework are the principles of human dignity, need and solidarity, and cost efficiency. The Swedish approach thus contrasts with the British experience of many local initiatives but an absence of national political guidance. The absence of political consensus on many aspects of social policy in the United Kingdom is a major obstacle to developing an agreed ethical framework within which decision makers in the National Health Service can work.

摘要

瑞典政府最近发布了一份关于医疗保健优先事项的报告。该报告由一个跨党派的政治家小组撰写,广泛借鉴了公众、医疗专业人员的意见、早期地方优先事项设定活动的经验以及基于研究的证据。它为处理医疗保健资源分配问题制定了一个伦理框架。该框架的基础是人的尊严、需求与团结以及成本效益原则。因此,瑞典的做法与英国许多地方举措的情况形成对比,英国缺乏国家政治指导。在英国,社会政策的许多方面缺乏政治共识,这是在国民医疗服务体系内制定一个决策者可以遵循的商定伦理框架的主要障碍。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2405/2350553/02d2888ab38a/bmj00533-0047-a.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验