Suppr超能文献

经呼气末正压通气(PEEP)治疗的新生儿期后呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)的预后

Prognosis of post-neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) treated with positive end-expiratory pressure ventilation (PEEP).

作者信息

van Haeringen J R, Blokzijl E J, van Dijl W, Kleine J W, Peset R, Sluiter H J

出版信息

Scand J Respir Dis. 1975;56(4):185-94.

PMID:1105779
Abstract

Thirty-six patients with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) were treated with mechanical ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). In 16 patients the RDS was the result of direct pulmonary injury due to chest trauma (group A), and in 20 patients the RDS followed non-direct injury of the lungs (group B). Fifteen patients died. At the moment of death the RDS had disappeared. No difference in mortality existed between groups A and B. Four patients died from causes unrelated to the RDS, one patient died from an avoidable error in the treatment. The ultimate outcome did not seem to be related to age, use of mechanical ventilation or PEEP, or occurrence of complications (e.g. a pneumothorax, which appeared to be related rather to the chest trauma). Of probably prognostic significance was the presence of a combination of massive aspiration and RDS. Of the 12 patients who suffered from this combination, nine died. PEEP ventilation was more unsuccessful in raising PaO2 appreciably in these patients than in others. The combination of massive aspiration and RDS posses a therapeutic dilemma. PEEP ventilation is invaluable in the treatment of RDS. Interruption of the PEEP within the first 1-2 days may sometimes result in massive recurrence of the RDS. Endotracheal suctioning which is a prerequisite for the treatment of massive aspiration, may under these circumstances be virtually impossible within this period. A compromise, including PEEP ventilation for as short a period as possible (usually no longer than 2 to 3 days) without interruption, followed thereafter by intensive physiotherapy with endotracheal suctioning, may succeed in saving some of the patients.

摘要

36例呼吸窘迫综合征(RDS)患者接受了呼气末正压(PEEP)机械通气治疗。16例患者的RDS是由胸部创伤导致的直接肺损伤所致(A组),20例患者的RDS继发于非直接肺损伤(B组)。15例患者死亡。死亡时RDS已消失。A组和B组的死亡率无差异。4例患者死于与RDS无关的原因,1例患者死于治疗中的可避免错误。最终结局似乎与年龄、机械通气或PEEP的使用、或并发症的发生(如气胸,似乎与胸部创伤关系更大)无关。大量误吸合并RDS可能具有预后意义。在12例患有这种合并症的患者中,9例死亡。与其他患者相比,PEEP通气在这些患者中更难以显著提高动脉血氧分压(PaO2)。大量误吸合并RDS构成了一个治疗难题。PEEP通气在RDS治疗中非常重要。在最初1 - 2天内中断PEEP有时可能导致RDS大量复发。气管内吸痰是大量误吸治疗的前提条件,在此期间在这种情况下几乎不可能进行。一种折中的方法,包括尽可能短时间(通常不超过2至3天)不间断地进行PEEP通气,之后进行强化物理治疗并进行气管内吸痰,可能成功挽救一些患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验