McLaughlin J, Roozendaal B, Dumas T, Gupta A, Ajilore O, Hsieh J, Ho D, Lawrence M, McGaugh J L, Sapolsky R
Department of Biological Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Nov 7;97(23):12804-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.210350097.
Numerous studies have demonstrated that gene therapy interventions can protect neurons from death after neurological insults. In nearly all such studies, however, "protection" consists of reduced neurotoxicity, with no demonstrated preservation of neuronal function. We used a herpes simplex virus-1 system to overexpress either the Glut-1 glucose transporter (GT) (to buffer energetics), or the apoptosis inhibitor Bcl-2. Both decreased hippocampal neuron loss to similar extents during excitotoxic insults in vitro and in vivo. However, the mediating mechanisms and consequences of the two interventions differed. GT overexpression attenuated early, energy-dependent facets of cell death, blocking oxygen radical accumulation. Bcl-2 expression, in contrast, blocked components of death downstream from the energetic and oxidative facets. Most importantly, GT- but not Bcl-2-mediated protection preserved hippocampal function as assessed spatial maze performance. Thus, gene therapeutic sparing of neurons from insult-induced death does not necessarily translate into sparing of function.
众多研究表明,基因治疗干预可在神经损伤后保护神经元免于死亡。然而,几乎在所有此类研究中,“保护”仅表现为神经毒性降低,并未证明神经元功能得以保留。我们使用单纯疱疹病毒1系统来过表达Glut-1葡萄糖转运蛋白(GT)(以缓冲能量)或凋亡抑制因子Bcl-2。在体外和体内兴奋性毒性损伤期间,二者均在相似程度上减少了海马神经元的损失。然而,这两种干预的介导机制和后果有所不同。GT过表达减弱了细胞死亡早期的能量依赖性方面,阻止了氧自由基的积累。相比之下,Bcl-2的表达则阻断了能量和氧化方面下游的死亡成分。最重要的是,如通过空间迷宫表现所评估的那样,GT介导而非Bcl-2介导的保护作用保留了海马功能。因此,基因治疗使神经元免于损伤诱导的死亡并不一定能转化为功能的保留。