Suppr超能文献

脓毒症和脓毒性休克中的抗炎治疗

Anti-inflammatory therapies in sepsis and septic shock.

作者信息

Freeman B D, Natanson C

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Box 8109, Suite 6104, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.

出版信息

Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2000 Jul;9(7):1651-63. doi: 10.1517/13543784.9.7.1651.

Abstract

Despite advances in supportive care, the morbidity and mortality rate resulting from sepsis and septic shock remain high (30 - 50%). A central hypothesis driving sepsis research in recent years is that this syndrome is the result of excessive inflammation. Therapies designed to inhibit the inflammatory response were first shown to be markedly beneficial in animal models of sepsis and then tested in numerous clinical trials involving thousands of patients. Three broad anti-inflammatory strategies have been investigated. First, glucocorticoids in high doses administered at the onset of sepsis were studied. This approach proved unsuccessful. More recently, however, glucocorticoids in lower doses have been found to have a beneficial effect in patients with septic shock. Whether the mechanism of this treatment benefit is through inhibition of inflammation, or by counteracting a relative steroid refractoriness occurring during sepsis, remains unknown. The next focus of research were agents active against the endotoxin molecule. However, as with the experience with glucocorticoids, this approach lacked a consistent pattern of efficacy. It is unclear if this lack of efficacy is the result of endotoxin being a poor therapeutic target, or from testing agents which lacked the appropriate biological activity. Most recently, clinical trials in sepsis have focused on inhibiting specific host pro-inflammatory mediators (e.g., TNF, interleukins). While individual trials of inhibitors of these pro-inflammatory mediators failed to show a convincing benefit, pooling the results of these trials suggest that this approach has a marginal effect, supporting a role for excessive inflammation in sepsis. An unanswered question is reconcilling the very favourable effects obtained with anti-inflammatory treatments in animal models with the marginal results in humans. Further clinical and laboratory research is needed and may provide insight into more effective ways to use the anti-inflammatory agents already tested, or to investigate other potentially more effective anti-inflammatory agents in this syndrome.

摘要

尽管在支持性治疗方面取得了进展,但脓毒症和脓毒性休克导致的发病率和死亡率仍然很高(30%-50%)。近年来推动脓毒症研究的一个核心假说是,这种综合征是过度炎症反应的结果。旨在抑制炎症反应的疗法最初在脓毒症动物模型中显示出显著益处,随后在涉及数千名患者的众多临床试验中进行了测试。已经研究了三种广泛的抗炎策略。首先,研究了在脓毒症发作时给予高剂量的糖皮质激素。这种方法被证明是不成功的。然而,最近发现低剂量的糖皮质激素对脓毒性休克患者有有益作用。这种治疗益处的机制是通过抑制炎症,还是通过抵消脓毒症期间出现的相对类固醇抵抗,仍然未知。研究的下一个重点是针对内毒素分子的活性药物。然而,与糖皮质激素的情况一样,这种方法缺乏一致的疗效模式。尚不清楚这种疗效不佳是由于内毒素是一个较差的治疗靶点,还是由于测试的药物缺乏适当的生物活性。最近,脓毒症的临床试验集中在抑制特定的宿主促炎介质(如肿瘤坏死因子、白细胞介素)。虽然这些促炎介质抑制剂的个别试验未能显示出令人信服的益处,但汇总这些试验的结果表明,这种方法有一定的边际效应,支持过度炎症在脓毒症中的作用。一个未解决的问题是,如何协调在动物模型中抗炎治疗取得的非常有利的效果与在人类中取得的边际效果。需要进一步的临床和实验室研究,这可能会为更有效地使用已经测试过的抗炎药物,或研究该综合征中其他可能更有效的抗炎药物提供见解。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验