• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

初级保健医生对乳腺癌-卵巢癌易感性基因检测的知识和态度。

Primary care physicians' knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer predisposition.

作者信息

Escher M, Sappino A P

机构信息

Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Geneva University Hospital, Switzerland.

出版信息

Ann Oncol. 2000 Sep;11(9):1131-5. doi: 10.1023/a:1008319114278.

DOI:10.1023/a:1008319114278
PMID:11061607
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary health care providers are expected to be directly involved in the genetic testing for cancer susceptibility. This study assessed physicians' knowledge, attitude and perception of their role towards testing for hereditary breast ovarian cancer.

DESIGN

A mail-in survey was sent to all general practitioners, internists, obstetrician-gynecologists and oncologists in private practice in Geneva county, Switzerland. Questions included socio-demographic variables, knowledge about hereditary breast ovarian cancer, attitude towards testing and assessment of their role in the pre- and post-test procedure.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty-nine (65%) of four hundred questionnaires were returned of which two hundred forty-three (61%) were analysed. Response rates were similar between specialties; women answered more frequently. The majority of the respondents (87%) approved of genetic susceptibility testing. The most common objection to testing was the absence of approved strategies for the prevention and detection of early breast cancer. Most physicians felt they had an active part to play in the pre-test procedure, the disclosure of results, and especially the consultants' long-term care and support (99%). Physicians correctly answered a third (32%) of the knowledge questions. The abstention rate for individual items ranged from 13% to 60%. Scores varied by specialty. Oncologists were more knowledgeable than gynecologists, internists and general practitioners.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of the primary care physicians in this study have a favourable attitude and are ready to play a prominent role in genetic counseling and testing for breast ovarian cancer predisposition. Defective knowledge scores, however, underline the need for targeted educational programs.

摘要

背景

初级医疗保健提供者应直接参与癌症易感性的基因检测。本研究评估了医生对遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌检测的知识、态度以及对自身角色的认知。

设计

向瑞士日内瓦县所有私人执业的全科医生、内科医生、妇产科医生和肿瘤学家发送了一份邮寄调查问卷。问题包括社会人口统计学变量、关于遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌的知识、对检测的态度以及对他们在检测前和检测后程序中角色的评估。

结果

400份问卷中有259份(65%)被退回,其中243份(61%)被分析。各专业的回复率相似;女性回复更为频繁。大多数受访者(87%)赞成进行基因易感性检测。对检测最常见的反对意见是缺乏预防和早期乳腺癌检测的批准策略。大多数医生认为他们在检测前程序、结果披露,尤其是在咨询者的长期护理和支持方面(99%)可以发挥积极作用。医生正确回答了三分之一(32%)的知识问题。单个项目的弃权率在13%至60%之间。得分因专业而异。肿瘤学家比妇科医生、内科医生和全科医生知识更丰富。

结论

本研究中的大多数初级保健医生态度积极,愿意在遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌易感性的遗传咨询和检测中发挥重要作用。然而,知识得分较低凸显了针对性教育项目的必要性。

相似文献

1
Primary care physicians' knowledge and attitudes towards genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer predisposition.初级保健医生对乳腺癌-卵巢癌易感性基因检测的知识和态度。
Ann Oncol. 2000 Sep;11(9):1131-5. doi: 10.1023/a:1008319114278.
2
Swiss primary care physicians' knowledge, attitudes and perception towards genetic testing for hereditary breast cancer.瑞士初级保健医生对遗传性乳腺癌基因检测的知识、态度和认知
Fam Cancer. 2003;2(3-4):153-8. doi: 10.1023/b:fame.0000004597.29811.8e.
3
Knowledge and attitudes of gynecologists regarding genetic counseling for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.妇科医生对遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌遗传咨询的认知与态度。
Patient Educ Couns. 2003 Feb;49(2):183-8. doi: 10.1016/s0738-3991(02)00117-9.
4
Genetic testing for susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer: evaluating the impact of a direct-to-consumer marketing campaign on physicians' knowledge and practices.乳腺癌和卵巢癌易感性的基因检测:评估直接面向消费者的营销活动对医生知识和实践的影响。
Genet Med. 2006 Jun;8(6):361-70. doi: 10.1097/01.gim.0000223544.68475.6c.
5
Knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of Alabama's primary care physicians regarding cancer genetics.阿拉巴马州初级保健医生对癌症遗传学的知识、态度和行为。
Acad Med. 2000 Aug;75(8):850-2. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200008000-00021.
6
Diffusion of breast cancer risk assessment in primary care.乳腺癌风险评估在初级保健中的推广。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2009 May-Jun;22(3):272-9. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2009.03.080153.
7
Hereditary breast/ovarian and colorectal cancer genetics knowledge in a national sample of US physicians.美国医生全国样本中的遗传性乳腺癌/卵巢癌和结直肠癌遗传学知识
J Med Genet. 2005 Oct;42(10):749-55. doi: 10.1136/jmg.2004.030296. Epub 2005 Mar 22.
8
Knowledge and opinions regarding BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic testing among primary care physicians.初级保健医生对BRCA1和BRCA2基因检测的了解与看法。
J Genet Couns. 2020 Feb;29(1):122-130. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1189. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
9
Does knowledge about the genetics of breast cancer differ between nongeneticist physicians who do or do not discuss or order BRCA testing?在是否讨论或安排BRCA检测的非遗传学家医生之间,他们对乳腺癌遗传学的了解是否存在差异?
Genet Med. 2003 Mar-Apr;5(2):99-105. doi: 10.1097/01.GIM.0000055198.63593.32.
10
Physicians' experience, practice and education, on genetic testing and genetic counseling: a nationwide survey study in Greece.医生在基因检测和遗传咨询方面的经验、实践和教育:希腊全国调查研究。
Fam Cancer. 2022 Oct;21(4):479-487. doi: 10.1007/s10689-022-00290-4. Epub 2022 Jan 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessment of medical knowledge toward genetic testing for individuals with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome in Brazil.巴西针对遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌综合征患者的基因检测医学知识评估。
Prev Med Rep. 2023 Aug 2;35:102356. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102356. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Malaysian nurses' knowledge and attitudes regarding BRCA genetic testing.马来西亚护士对BRCA基因检测的知识和态度。
Belitung Nurs J. 2021 Dec 6;7(6):493-499. doi: 10.33546/bnj.1802. eCollection 2021.
3
Results of a 2021 French National Survey on Management of Patients with Advanced Stage Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.
2021年法国晚期上皮性卵巢癌患者管理全国性调查结果。
J Clin Med. 2021 Oct 21;10(21):4829. doi: 10.3390/jcm10214829.
4
Factors influencing practitioners' who do not participate in ethically complex, legally available care: scoping review.影响未参与伦理复杂、合法可提供的医疗保健的从业者的因素:范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2021 Sep 28;22(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12910-021-00703-6.
5
Breast Cancer Risk Assessment and Primary Prevention Advice in Primary Care: A Systematic Review of Provider Attitudes and Routine Behaviours.基层医疗中乳腺癌风险评估与一级预防建议:对医疗服务提供者态度和常规行为的系统评价
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Aug 18;13(16):4150. doi: 10.3390/cancers13164150.
6
The importance of preventative medicine in conjunction with modern day genetic studies.预防医学与现代基因研究相结合的重要性。
Genes Dis. 2018 Apr 12;5(2):107-111. doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2018.04.002. eCollection 2018 Jun.
7
Hospital nursing leadership-led interventions increased genomic awareness and educational intent in Magnet settings.医院护理领导力主导的干预措施提高了磁性环境中的基因组意识和教育意愿。
Nurs Outlook. 2018 May-Jun;66(3):244-253. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2017.10.010. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
8
Health care professionals' attitudes towards population-based genetic testing and risk-stratification for ovarian cancer: a cross-sectional survey.医疗保健专业人员对基于人群的卵巢癌基因检测和风险分层的态度:一项横断面调查。
BMC Womens Health. 2017 Dec 16;17(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12905-017-0488-6.
9
Insights into BRCA1/2 Genetic Counseling from Ethnically Diverse Latina Breast Cancer Survivors.不同种族的拉丁裔乳腺癌幸存者对BRCA1/2基因咨询的见解。
J Genet Couns. 2017 Dec;26(6):1221-1237. doi: 10.1007/s10897-017-0096-5. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
10
The current use and attitudes towards tumor genome sequencing in breast cancer.乳腺癌中肿瘤基因组测序的当前应用情况及相关态度
Sci Rep. 2016 Mar 2;6:22517. doi: 10.1038/srep22517.