Chen R S, Lapuerta P
Pharmaceutical Research Institute, Bristol-Myers Squibb, P.O. Box 4000, Princeton, NJ 08543-4000, USA.
Curr Hypertens Rep. 2000 Dec;2(6):525-9. doi: 10.1007/s11906-996-0036-5.
The use of pharmacoeconomic analyses to evaluate the appropriateness of treatment regimens is increasing rapidly. Trials that study the efficacy of antihypertensive agents do not often measure long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, so complementary methods are needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of these agents. One method is to compare agents on the basis of their costs and blood pressure-lowering efficacy, producing a ratio of cost per millimeter of mercury lowering, or cost/mm Hg. This provides a simple, transparent method with which to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of antihypertensive agents. It also allows the cost-effectiveness of a blood pressure treatment to be assessed in terms of ambulatory blood pressure data. The use of cost/mm Hg requires assumptions that tolerability of agents is comparable and that blood pressure lowering is a valid surrogate for cardiovascular risk reduction. Given the emergence of new treatments that have differences in blood pressure efficacy, cost/mm Hg is likely to become increasingly used as an indicator of economic value.
使用药物经济学分析来评估治疗方案的合理性正在迅速增加。研究抗高血压药物疗效的试验通常不测量长期心血管发病率和死亡率,因此需要补充方法来评估这些药物的成本效益。一种方法是根据药物的成本和降压效果进行比较,得出每降低一毫米汞柱的成本比,即成本/毫米汞柱。这提供了一种简单、透明的方法来评估抗高血压药物的成本效益。它还允许根据动态血压数据评估血压治疗的成本效益。使用成本/毫米汞柱需要假设药物的耐受性相当,并且血压降低是降低心血管风险的有效替代指标。鉴于出现了血压疗效不同的新治疗方法,成本/毫米汞柱可能会越来越多地被用作经济价值的指标。