Thompson R S, Rivara F P, Thompson D C, Barlow W E, Sugg N K, Maiuro R D, Rubanowice D M
Department of Preventive Care and the Center for Health Studies, Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Seattle, Washington, 98101-1448, USA.
Am J Prev Med. 2000 Nov;19(4):253-63. doi: 10.1016/s0749-3797(00)00231-2.
Diagnosis of domestic violence (DV) in primary care is low compared to its prevalence. Care for patients is deficient. Over a 1-year period, we tested the effectiveness of an intensive intervention to improve asking about DV, case finding, and management in primary care. The intervention included skill training for providers, environmental orchestration (posters in clinical areas, DV questions on health questionnaires), and measurement and feedback.
We conducted a group-randomized controlled trial in five primary care clinics of a large health maintenance organization (HMO). Outcomes were assessed at baseline and follow-up by survey, medical record review, and qualitative means.
Improved provider self-efficacy, decreased fear of offense and safety concerns, and increased perceived asking about DV were documented at 9 months, and also at 21 months (except for perceived asking) after intervention initiation. Documented asking about DV was increased by 14.3% with a 3.9-fold relative increase at 9 months in intervention clinics compared to controls. Case finding increased 1.3-fold (95%, confidence interval 0.67-2.7).
The intervention improved documented asking about DV in practice up to 9 months later. This was mainly because of the routine use of health questionnaires containing DV questions at physical examination visits and the placement of DV posters in clinical areas. A small increase in case finding also resulted. System changes appear to be a cost-effective method to increase DV asking and identification.
与家庭暴力(DV)的患病率相比,初级保健中对其的诊断率较低。对患者的护理存在不足。在一年的时间里,我们测试了一种强化干预措施在改善初级保健中询问DV情况、病例发现及管理方面的有效性。该干预措施包括为医护人员提供技能培训、环境布置(临床区域张贴海报、健康问卷中设置DV相关问题)以及测量与反馈。
我们在一家大型健康维护组织(HMO)的五家初级保健诊所进行了一项群组随机对照试验。通过调查、病历审查和定性方法在基线和随访时评估结果。
在干预开始后的9个月以及21个月时(除了感知到的询问情况),记录显示医护人员的自我效能感有所提高,对冒犯的恐惧和安全担忧有所减少,对DV的感知询问有所增加。与对照组相比,干预诊所中在9个月时记录的关于DV的询问增加了14.3%,相对增加了3.9倍。病例发现增加了1.3倍(95%,置信区间0.67 - 2.7)。
该干预措施在长达9个月后提高了实际中记录的关于DV的询问情况。这主要是因为在体格检查就诊时常规使用包含DV问题的健康问卷以及在临床区域张贴DV海报。病例发现也有小幅增加。系统变革似乎是一种增加对DV的询问和识别的具有成本效益的方法。