Kushner B H, Heller G, Kramer K, Cheung N K
Department of Pediatrics and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York 10021, USA.
Cancer. 2000 Nov 15;89(10):2122-30.
The authors assessed key effects of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) used prophylactically with multiple cycles of strongly myelosuppressive alkylator-based combination chemotherapy. To the authors' knowledge, no large study has focused on G-CSF in this setting, yet this kind of treatment has recently become standard for poor risk pediatric solid tumors such as neuroblastoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS. Children with neuroblastoma received cyclophosphamide 140 mg/kg (i.e., 4200 mg/m(2)), doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2), and vincristine (CAV) in cycles 1, 2, 4, and 6 and cisplatin 200 mg/m(2) and etoposide 600 mg/m(2) (P/VP) in cycles 3, 5, and 7. To maximize dose intensity, chemotherapy was begun as soon as the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was > or = 500/microL and platelet count was > or = 100,000/microL. No cytokines were used during 1990-1994 (control group; n = 28), but G-CSF was used from 1995 to 1998 (G-CSF group; n = 30) at 5 microg/kg/day subcutaneously from 1 day after chemotherapy until the ANC was > or = 500/microL on 2 successive days or was > or = 1000/microL.
Each cycle of CAV decreased ANCs to < 200/microL in all 58 patients; recovery to 200/microL and to 500/microL was significantly sooner with G-CSF. In contrast, P/VP did not invariably cause severe neutropenia: similar numbers of patients in each group maintained ANCs > or = 200/microL and > or = 500/microL; recovery to 500/microL (but not to 200/microL) was significantly faster in the G-CSF group. G-CSF had no impact on rates of febrile episodes. Bacterial/fungal infections were slightly less frequent in the G-CSF group with CAV (P = 0.11) but not with P/VP. Dose intensity through cycle 4 was the same in both groups. Beginning with cycle 3, G-CSF patients had slower recovery to platelet counts > or = 100,000/microL. Response rates were similar in the two groups.
With multiple cycles of strongly myelosuppressive alkylator-based combination chemotherapy, prophylactic use of G-CSF hastened ANC recovery but did not reduce the incidence of febrile episodes, had little impact on infection rates, did not yield augmented dose intensity, was associated with prolonged thrombocytopenia, and had no effect on response rates of neuroblastoma. The data support more limited use of G-CSF.
作者评估了粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)在多周期强烈骨髓抑制性的基于烷化剂的联合化疗中预防性使用的关键效果。据作者所知,尚无大型研究聚焦于这种情况下的G-CSF,但这种治疗方法最近已成为高危儿童实体瘤(如神经母细胞瘤)的标准治疗方案。
神经母细胞瘤患儿在第1、2、4和6周期接受环磷酰胺140mg/kg(即4200mg/m²)、多柔比星75mg/m²和长春新碱(CAV)治疗,在第3、5和7周期接受顺铂200mg/m²和依托泊苷600mg/m²(P/VP)治疗。为使剂量强度最大化,一旦绝对中性粒细胞计数(ANC)≥500/μL且血小板计数≥100,000/μL,即开始化疗。1990 - 1994年期间未使用细胞因子(对照组;n = 28),但1995年至1998年使用了G-CSF(G-CSF组;n = 30),从化疗后第1天起皮下注射5μg/kg/天,直至ANC连续2天≥500/μL或≥1000/μL。
所有58例患者中,每个周期的CAV均使ANC降至<200/μL;使用G-CSF时,ANC恢复至200/μL和500/μL的时间明显更快。相比之下,P/VP并非总是导致严重中性粒细胞减少:每组中ANC≥200/μL和≥500/μL的患者数量相似;G-CSF组中ANC恢复至500/μL(但不是200/μL)明显更快。G-CSF对发热发作率无影响。G-CSF组中CAV治疗时细菌/真菌感染的频率略低(P = 0.11),但P/VP治疗时并非如此。两组第4周期前的剂量强度相同。从第3周期开始,使用G-CSF的患者血小板计数恢复至≥100,000/μL的速度较慢。两组的缓解率相似。
在多周期强烈骨髓抑制性的基于烷化剂的联合化疗中,预防性使用G-CSF可加速ANC恢复,但未降低发热发作的发生率,对感染率影响不大,未提高剂量强度,与血小板减少持续时间延长有关,且对神经母细胞瘤的缓解率无影响。这些数据支持更有限地使用G-CSF。