Texas Children's Cancer and Hematology Centers, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, Texas.
Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2020 Oct;67(10):e28417. doi: 10.1002/pbc.28417. Epub 2020 Jul 30.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Standard supportive care during induction therapy for high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL) includes primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) aimed at limiting duration of neutropenia, reducing infection risk, and minimizing treatment delays. Preclinical models suggest that G-CSF promotes maintenance of neuroblastoma cancer stem cells and may reduce the efficacy of chemotherapy. This study's objective was to determine the safety and feasibility of administering induction chemotherapy without routine use of prophylactic G-CSF.
DESIGN/METHODS: Children with newly diagnosed HR-NBL received six-cycle induction chemotherapy regimen without prophylactic G-CSF in four cycles. G-CSF was administered for stem cell mobilization after cycle 3 and granulocyte-monocyte colony-stimulating factor after cycle 5 prior to surgical resection of primary disease. The primary outcome measure was the incidence of grade 3 or higher infection. We hypothesized that the per patient infection rate would be comparable to our institutional baseline rate of 58% in patients with HR-NBL receiving induction chemotherapy with prophylactic growth factor support. The trial used an A'Hern single-stage design.
Twelve patients with HR-NBL received 58 cycles of chemotherapy on study. Three patients completed the entire six-cycle regimen with no infections. Nine patients experienced grade 3 infections (bacteremia four, urinary tract infection two, skin/soft tissue infection three). No patients experienced grade 4 infections or required intensive care treatment for infection.
A greater than expected number of serious bacterial infections were observed during administration of induction chemotherapy for HR-NBL without primary prophylactic G-CSF. These results support continued prophylactic administration growth factor during induction chemotherapy.
背景/目的:高危神经母细胞瘤(HR-NBL)诱导治疗期间的标准支持性治疗包括主要预防性粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF),旨在限制中性粒细胞减少症的持续时间,降低感染风险,并最大限度地减少治疗延迟。临床前模型表明,G-CSF 促进神经母细胞瘤癌症干细胞的维持,并可能降低化疗的疗效。本研究的目的是确定不常规使用预防性 G-CSF 进行诱导化疗的安全性和可行性。
方法/设计:新诊断为 HR-NBL 的儿童在四个周期中接受不含预防性 G-CSF 的六周期诱导化疗方案。在第 3 周期后进行干细胞动员,并在第 5 周期后进行粒细胞-单核细胞集落刺激因子治疗,然后进行原发疾病的手术切除。主要观察指标为 3 级或以上感染的发生率。我们假设每位患者的感染率将与我们机构中接受预防性生长因子支持的 HR-NBL 患者接受诱导化疗的 58%感染率相当。该试验使用 A'Hern 单阶段设计。
12 名 HR-NBL 患儿接受了 58 个周期的化疗。3 名患者完成了整个 6 个周期的治疗方案,无感染。9 名患者发生 3 级感染(菌血症 4 例,尿路感染 2 例,皮肤/软组织感染 3 例)。无 4 级感染或因感染需要重症监护治疗的患者。
在没有原发性预防性 G-CSF 的情况下,接受 HR-NBL 诱导化疗期间观察到比预期更多的严重细菌感染。这些结果支持在诱导化疗期间继续预防性使用生长因子。