Relation of surgical volume to outcome.
作者信息
Birkmeyer J D
出版信息
Ann Surg. 2000 Nov;232(5):724-5. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200011000-00023.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Relation of surgical volume to outcome.手术量与预后的关系。
Ann Surg. 2000 Nov;232(5):724-5. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200011000-00023.
2
Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.八项常见手术的手术量与预后的关系：来自退伍军人事务部国家外科质量改进计划的结果
Ann Surg. 1999 Sep;230(3):414-29; discussion 429-32. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199909000-00014.
3
Using a composite readmission measure to assess surgical quality in the Veterans Health Administration: how well does it correlate with established surgical measures?使用综合再入院指标评估退伍军人健康管理局的手术质量：它与既定的手术指标相关性如何？
JAMA Surg. 2014 Nov;149(11):1206-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1095.
4
The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIP: the first national, validated, outcome-based, risk-adjusted, and peer-controlled program for the measurement and enhancement of the quality of surgical care. National VA Surgical Quality Improvement Program.美国退伍军人事务部的国家外科质量改进计划（NSQIP）：首个全国性、经过验证、基于结果、风险调整且由同行控制的用于衡量和提升外科护理质量的计划。国家退伍军人事务部外科质量改进计划。
Ann Surg. 1998 Oct;228(4):491-507. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199810000-00006.
5
VA studies patient outcomes and best practices in surgery.美国退伍军人事务部研究手术患者的治疗结果和最佳实践。
OR Manager. 1998 Mar;14(3):1, 29-30.
6
The right stuff: Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement Project.合适的要素：退伍军人事务部国家外科质量改进项目
Anesth Analg. 2008 Dec;107(6):1772-4. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31818af90a.
7
Measuring surgical quality: which measure should we trust?衡量手术质量：我们应该相信哪种衡量标准？
JAMA Surg. 2014 Nov;149(11):1210-2. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.373.
8
Fifteen years of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in review.十五年国家手术质量改进计划回顾。
Am J Surg. 2009 Nov;198(5 Suppl):S9-S18. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.003.
9
Complications and Failure to Rescue After Inpatient Noncardiac Surgery in the Veterans Affairs Health System.退伍军人事务部医疗体系中住院非心脏手术后的并发症和抢救失败。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Dec 1;151(12):1157-1165. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.2920.
10
Comparisons of quality of surgical care between the US Department of Veterans Affairs and the private sector.美国退伍军人事务部与私营部门外科护理质量的比较。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Dec;211(6):823-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2010.09.001.
引用本文的文献
1
Hospital Volume and Textbook Outcomes in Minimally Invasive Hepatectomy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.肝细胞癌微创肝切除术中的医院手术量与教科书式预后
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 May;27(5):956-964. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05609-9. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
2
The role of surgery in global health: analysis of United States inpatient procedure frequency by condition using the Global Burden of Disease 2010 framework.外科手术在全球健康中的作用：利用《2010年全球疾病负担》框架按疾病分析美国住院手术频率
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 26;9(2):e89693. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089693. eCollection 2014.
3
Increased use of multidisciplinary treatment modalities adds little to the outcome of rectal cancer treated by optimal total mesorectal excision.增加使用多学科治疗方法对通过最佳全直肠系膜切除治疗的直肠癌的结果影响不大。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2012 Oct;27(10):1275-83. doi: 10.1007/s00384-012-1440-8. Epub 2012 Mar 8.
4
Surgeon volume versus morbidity and cost in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy in an academic community medical center.在学术型社区医疗中心接受胰十二指肠切除术的患者中，外科医生手术量与发病率和费用的关系。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2010 Dec;14(12):1990-6. doi: 10.1007/s11605-010-1280-1. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
5
Surgery residency training programmes have greater impact on outcomes after pancreaticoduodenectomy than hospital volume or surgeon frequency.外科住院医师培训计划对外科胰腺十二指肠切除术术后结果的影响大于医院容量或外科医生手术频率的影响。
HPB (Oxford). 2010 Feb;12(1):68-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2009.00130.x.
6
[Surgical volume. An American perspective].[手术量。美国视角]
Chirurg. 2007 Nov;78(11):1028-36. doi: 10.1007/s00104-007-1425-2.
7
AAA benchmarking by Dr Foster: a cause for concern?福斯特博士的AAA基准测试：令人担忧的原因？
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 May;89(4):384-8. doi: 10.1308/003588407X183445.
8
The Leapfrog volume criteria may fall short in identifying high-quality surgical centers.“跨越”体积标准在识别高质量外科中心方面可能存在不足。
Ann Surg. 2003 Oct;238(4):447-55; discussion 455-7. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000089850.27592.eb.
本文引用的文献
1
Should we regionalize major surgery? Potential benefits and policy considerations.我们应该对大型手术进行区域化吗？潜在益处及政策考量。
J Am Coll Surg. 2000 Mar;190(3):341-9. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00270-7.
2
Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.八项常见手术的手术量与预后的关系：来自退伍军人事务部国家外科质量改进计划的结果
Ann Surg. 1999 Sep;230(3):414-29; discussion 429-32. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199909000-00014.
Zotero 插件