• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
AAA benchmarking by Dr Foster: a cause for concern?福斯特博士的AAA基准测试:令人担忧的原因?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 May;89(4):384-8. doi: 10.1308/003588407X183445.
2
Measure what matters: institutional outcome data are superior to the use of surrogate markers to define "center of excellence" for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.衡量关键指标:机构结局数据优于使用替代指标来定义腹主动脉瘤修复的“卓越中心”。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2008 May-Jun;22(3):328-34. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2007.09.013. Epub 2008 Apr 14.
3
Reduction of in-hospital mortality among California hospitals meeting Leapfrog evidence-based standards for abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.加利福尼亚州符合腹主动脉瘤修复循证标准的医院,其院内死亡率降低。
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jun;47(6):1155-6; discussion 1163-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.021.
4
A decade of change in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in the United States: Have we improved outcomes equally between men and women?美国腹主动脉瘤修复十年变迁:我们是否在同等程度上改善了男性和女性的治疗效果?
J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):230-8; discussion 238. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.09.043.
5
The relationship between volume and outcome following elective open repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) in 131 German hospitals.131家德国医院择期开放性腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复术后容量与预后的关系。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2007 Sep;34(3):260-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2007.05.006. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
6
Expanding use of emergency endovascular repair for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms: disparities in outcomes from a nationwide perspective.急诊血管内修复术在破裂腹主动脉瘤治疗中的应用扩展:基于全国视角的结局差异
J Vasc Surg. 2008 Jun;47(6):1165-70; discussion 1170-1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2008.01.055. Epub 2008 Apr 3.
7
A 21-year experience of abdominal aortic aneurysm operations in Edinburgh.在爱丁堡进行腹主动脉瘤手术的21年经验。
Br J Surg. 1998 May;85(5):645-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1998.00695.x.
8
Effect of endovascular aneurysm repair on the volume-outcome relationship in aneurysm repair.血管内动脉瘤修复术对动脉瘤修复中体积-结果关系的影响。
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009 Nov;2(6):624-32. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.848465. Epub 2009 Sep 22.
9
Understanding administrative abdominal aortic aneurysm mortality data.理解行政性腹主动脉瘤死亡率数据。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Mar;49(3):277-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.12.015. Epub 2015 Jan 23.
10
Outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: comparison of mortality defined by centralized VA Patient Treatment File data versus hospital-based chart review.腹主动脉瘤修复术后的结果:基于退伍军人事务部(VA)患者集中治疗档案数据定义的死亡率与基于医院病历审查的死亡率比较。
J Surg Res. 2000 Jan;88(1):42-6. doi: 10.1006/jsre.1999.5776.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical outcomes audit in vascular surgery: a shield for our profession.血管外科临床结果审计:我们职业的一道屏障。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2003 Jul;85(4):256-9. doi: 10.1308/003588403766274971.
2
Use of mortality rate after aortic surgery as a performance indicator.
Br J Surg. 2003 Jul;90(7):827-31. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4310.
3
What hospital mortality league tables tell you.医院死亡率排行榜能告诉你什么。
BMJ. 2003 Jun 21;326(7403):1397-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7403.1397-b.
4
Mortality control charts for comparing performance of surgical units: validation study using hospital mortality data.用于比较外科科室绩效的死亡率控制图:使用医院死亡率数据的验证研究
BMJ. 2003 Apr 12;326(7393):786-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7393.786.
5
Hospital mortality league tables.医院死亡率排行榜。
BMJ. 2003 Apr 12;326(7393):777-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7393.777.
6
Adjusted mortality rates: a tool for creating more meaningful league tables for stillbirth and infant mortality rates.
Public Health. 2002 Nov;116(6):315-21. doi: 10.1038/sj.ph.1900865.
7
Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.美国医院的手术量与手术死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 11;346(15):1128-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa012337.
8
Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative.高风险外科手术的容量标准:“跳蛙行动”的潜在益处。
Surgery. 2001 Sep;130(3):415-22. doi: 10.1067/msy.2001.117139.
9
Bristol, Shipman, and clinical governance: Shewhart's forgotten lessons.布里斯托尔、希普曼与临床治理:休哈特被遗忘的教训。
Lancet. 2001 Feb 10;357(9254):463-7. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(00)04019-8.
10
Relation of surgical volume to outcome.手术量与预后的关系。
Ann Surg. 2000 Nov;232(5):724-5. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200011000-00023.

福斯特博士的AAA基准测试:令人担忧的原因?

AAA benchmarking by Dr Foster: a cause for concern?

作者信息

Pandey V A, Kerle M I, Jenkins M P, Wolfe J H N

机构信息

Regional Vascular Unit, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 May;89(4):384-8. doi: 10.1308/003588407X183445.

DOI:10.1308/003588407X183445
PMID:17535616
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1963593/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The publication of interpretable performance data for hospitals is an important service. In November 2002, the medical benchmarking company Dr Foster published a league table based on the results of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The purpose of our study was to establish the validity of the data used in benchmarking.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data on elective infra-renal AAA (IRAAA) repair was obtained from three sources. Data used by Dr Foster was based on the hospital PAS system. The databases for both Dr Foster and PAS were analysed and cross-referenced to the vascular unit database maintained by a separately employed audit co-ordinator.

RESULTS

Of 395 total aortic aneurysm repairs, 223 (56%) were identified as elective IRAAA repairs on the unit database. Of these, 125 were identified on the PAS database and 115 on the Dr Foster database. The number of deaths was the same in both the unit and Dr Foster databases (n = 11) but the Dr Foster database included deaths in patients who had undergone juxtarenal (n = 1), Type III TAAA (n = 2) and Type IV TAAA (n = 4) repairs and omitted 7 deaths following IRAAA. The sensitivity and specificity for the PAS dataset was 0.51 and 0.93, respectively. For Dr Foster, the results were worse with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.41 and 0.86, respectively. The accuracy of the data was 0.6 and 0.69 for Dr Foster and PAS, respectively. Standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) were used to rank hospitals. Dr Foster's published SMR for elective AAA repair for our unit was 160. The actual SMR was 67.

CONCLUSIONS

Robust and accurate published league tables should be supported and commended but currently available data appear to be misleading and may cause unnecessary concern to patients.

摘要

引言

公布医院可解读的绩效数据是一项重要服务。2002年11月,医疗基准评估公司福斯特博士发布了一份基于腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复结果的排名表。我们研究的目的是确定用于基准评估的数据的有效性。

患者与方法

择期肾下AAA(IRAAA)修复的数据来自三个来源。福斯特博士使用的数据基于医院的患者管理系统(PAS)。对福斯特博士和PAS的数据库进行了分析,并与由单独聘请的审计协调员维护的血管科数据库进行了交叉核对。

结果

在总共395例主动脉瘤修复手术中,223例(56%)在科室数据库中被确定为择期IRAAA修复。其中,125例在PAS数据库中被识别,115例在福斯特博士数据库中被识别。科室数据库和福斯特博士数据库中的死亡人数相同(n = 11),但福斯特博士数据库包括了接受近肾主动脉瘤(n = 1)、III型胸腹主动脉瘤(n = 2)和IV型胸腹主动脉瘤(n = 4)修复患者的死亡情况,并且遗漏了IRAAA修复术后的7例死亡。PAS数据集的敏感性和特异性分别为0.51和0.93。对于福斯特博士的数据,结果更差,敏感性和特异性分别为0.41和0.86。福斯特博士和PAS数据的准确性分别为0.6和0.69。标准化死亡率(SMR)用于对医院进行排名。福斯特博士公布的我们科室择期AAA修复的SMR为160。实际SMR为67。

结论

应支持和赞扬稳健且准确的已发布排名表,但目前可用的数据似乎具有误导性,可能会引起患者不必要的担忧。