Suppr超能文献

福斯特博士的AAA基准测试:令人担忧的原因?

AAA benchmarking by Dr Foster: a cause for concern?

作者信息

Pandey V A, Kerle M I, Jenkins M P, Wolfe J H N

机构信息

Regional Vascular Unit, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 May;89(4):384-8. doi: 10.1308/003588407X183445.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The publication of interpretable performance data for hospitals is an important service. In November 2002, the medical benchmarking company Dr Foster published a league table based on the results of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair. The purpose of our study was to establish the validity of the data used in benchmarking.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data on elective infra-renal AAA (IRAAA) repair was obtained from three sources. Data used by Dr Foster was based on the hospital PAS system. The databases for both Dr Foster and PAS were analysed and cross-referenced to the vascular unit database maintained by a separately employed audit co-ordinator.

RESULTS

Of 395 total aortic aneurysm repairs, 223 (56%) were identified as elective IRAAA repairs on the unit database. Of these, 125 were identified on the PAS database and 115 on the Dr Foster database. The number of deaths was the same in both the unit and Dr Foster databases (n = 11) but the Dr Foster database included deaths in patients who had undergone juxtarenal (n = 1), Type III TAAA (n = 2) and Type IV TAAA (n = 4) repairs and omitted 7 deaths following IRAAA. The sensitivity and specificity for the PAS dataset was 0.51 and 0.93, respectively. For Dr Foster, the results were worse with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.41 and 0.86, respectively. The accuracy of the data was 0.6 and 0.69 for Dr Foster and PAS, respectively. Standardised mortality ratios (SMRs) were used to rank hospitals. Dr Foster's published SMR for elective AAA repair for our unit was 160. The actual SMR was 67.

CONCLUSIONS

Robust and accurate published league tables should be supported and commended but currently available data appear to be misleading and may cause unnecessary concern to patients.

摘要

引言

公布医院可解读的绩效数据是一项重要服务。2002年11月,医疗基准评估公司福斯特博士发布了一份基于腹主动脉瘤(AAA)修复结果的排名表。我们研究的目的是确定用于基准评估的数据的有效性。

患者与方法

择期肾下AAA(IRAAA)修复的数据来自三个来源。福斯特博士使用的数据基于医院的患者管理系统(PAS)。对福斯特博士和PAS的数据库进行了分析,并与由单独聘请的审计协调员维护的血管科数据库进行了交叉核对。

结果

在总共395例主动脉瘤修复手术中,223例(56%)在科室数据库中被确定为择期IRAAA修复。其中,125例在PAS数据库中被识别,115例在福斯特博士数据库中被识别。科室数据库和福斯特博士数据库中的死亡人数相同(n = 11),但福斯特博士数据库包括了接受近肾主动脉瘤(n = 1)、III型胸腹主动脉瘤(n = 2)和IV型胸腹主动脉瘤(n = 4)修复患者的死亡情况,并且遗漏了IRAAA修复术后的7例死亡。PAS数据集的敏感性和特异性分别为0.51和0.93。对于福斯特博士的数据,结果更差,敏感性和特异性分别为0.41和0.86。福斯特博士和PAS数据的准确性分别为0.6和0.69。标准化死亡率(SMR)用于对医院进行排名。福斯特博士公布的我们科室择期AAA修复的SMR为160。实际SMR为67。

结论

应支持和赞扬稳健且准确的已发布排名表,但目前可用的数据似乎具有误导性,可能会引起患者不必要的担忧。

相似文献

1
AAA benchmarking by Dr Foster: a cause for concern?福斯特博士的AAA基准测试:令人担忧的原因?
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 May;89(4):384-8. doi: 10.1308/003588407X183445.
9
Understanding administrative abdominal aortic aneurysm mortality data.理解行政性腹主动脉瘤死亡率数据。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015 Mar;49(3):277-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2014.12.015. Epub 2015 Jan 23.

本文引用的文献

2
Use of mortality rate after aortic surgery as a performance indicator.
Br J Surg. 2003 Jul;90(7):827-31. doi: 10.1002/bjs.4310.
3
What hospital mortality league tables tell you.医院死亡率排行榜能告诉你什么。
BMJ. 2003 Jun 21;326(7403):1397-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7403.1397-b.
5
Hospital mortality league tables.医院死亡率排行榜。
BMJ. 2003 Apr 12;326(7393):777-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.326.7393.777.
7
Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.美国医院的手术量与手术死亡率
N Engl J Med. 2002 Apr 11;346(15):1128-37. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa012337.
10
Relation of surgical volume to outcome.手术量与预后的关系。
Ann Surg. 2000 Nov;232(5):724-5. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200011000-00023.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验