• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

加速死亡:两种临终决策的比较

Hastening death: a comparison of two end-of-life decisions.

作者信息

Cicirelli V G, MacLean A P, Cox L S

机构信息

Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA.

出版信息

Death Stud. 2000 Jul-Aug;24(5):401-19. doi: 10.1080/07481180050045656.

DOI:10.1080/07481180050045656
PMID:11067673
Abstract

This study determined the relationship of psychosocial and background variables to elders' end-of-life (EOL) decision preferences. Responding to 5 EOL decision scenarios depicting terminally ill elders, 200 elders aged 60-90 indicated preferences regarding extending life (EL), refusing treatment (RT), and assisted suicide (AS). They were also assessed on religiosity, values, fear of death, locus of control, health, socioeconomic status, and age. Results of multinomial logistic regression indicated that EOL decisions of three groups (favoring EL, favoring RT, and favoring both AS and RT) were significantly influenced by religiosity, value for preservation of life, value for quality of life, fear of death, and locus of control belief. The importance of safeguarding older adults' autonomy in EOL decisions was stressed.

摘要

本研究确定了心理社会和背景变量与老年人临终(EOL)决策偏好之间的关系。针对描绘绝症老年人的5个临终决策场景,200名60 - 90岁的老年人表明了他们在延长生命(EL)、拒绝治疗(RT)和协助自杀(AS)方面的偏好。他们还接受了宗教信仰、价值观、对死亡的恐惧、控制点、健康状况、社会经济地位和年龄的评估。多项逻辑回归结果表明,三组(支持延长生命、支持拒绝治疗、支持协助自杀和拒绝治疗)的临终决策受到宗教信仰、对生命保存的重视、对生活质量的重视、对死亡的恐惧和控制点信念的显著影响。强调了在临终决策中保障老年人自主权的重要性。

相似文献

1
Hastening death: a comparison of two end-of-life decisions.加速死亡:两种临终决策的比较
Death Stud. 2000 Jul-Aug;24(5):401-19. doi: 10.1080/07481180050045656.
2
Preferences of the Dutch general public for a good death and associations with attitudes towards end-of-life decision-making.荷兰普通公众对善终的偏好以及与临终决策态度的关联。
Palliat Med. 2006 Oct;20(7):685-92. doi: 10.1177/0269216306070241.
3
Impact of perception of socioeconomic burden on advocacy for patient autonomy in end-of-life decision making: a study of societal attitudes.社会经济负担认知对临终决策中患者自主权倡导的影响:一项社会态度研究
Palliat Med. 2009 Jan;23(1):87-94. doi: 10.1177/0269216308099244. Epub 2008 Nov 7.
4
Stability of older adults' preferences for life-sustaining medical treatment.老年人对维持生命的医疗治疗偏好的稳定性。
Health Psychol. 2003 Nov;22(6):605-15. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.22.6.605.
5
Physicians' religiosity and end-of-life care attitudes and behaviors.医生的宗教信仰与临终关怀态度及行为。
Mt Sinai J Med. 2004 Oct;71(5):335-43.
6
End-of-life issues in intensive care units: a national random survey of nurses' knowledge and beliefs.重症监护病房中的临终问题:一项关于护士知识与信念的全国随机调查。
Am J Crit Care. 2001 Jul;10(4):216-29.
7
Family beliefs about end-of-life decisions: an interpersonal perspective.关于临终决策的家庭观念:一种人际视角
Death Stud. 2002 Sep;26(7):567-94. doi: 10.1080/074811802760191717.
8
Decisions at the end of life.临终决策。
Croat Med J. 2000 Jun;41(2):144-9.
9
Beyond the Supreme Court decision: nursing perspectives on end-of-life care.超越最高法院的裁决:护士对临终关怀的看法。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2000 Apr;27(3):445-55.
10
Trends and determinants of end-of-life practices in ALS in the Netherlands.荷兰肌萎缩侧索硬化症患者临终医疗行为的趋势及决定因素
Neurology. 2009 Sep 22;73(12):954-61. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181b87983.

引用本文的文献

1
Preferences for life-prolonging medical treatments and deference to the will of god.对延长生命的医疗治疗的偏好和对上帝旨意的尊重。
J Relig Health. 2009 Dec;48(4):418-30. doi: 10.1007/s10943-008-9205-y. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
2
Religion, risk, and medical decision making at the end of life.宗教、风险与临终医疗决策
J Aging Health. 2008 Aug;20(5):545-59. doi: 10.1177/0898264308317538. Epub 2008 Apr 28.