Lam T Y, Lee S W, So H S, Kwok S P
Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2000 Oct;10(5):269-73. doi: 10.1089/lap.2000.10.269.
One advantage of minimal-access surgery is that it produces less pain. A radially expanding trocar has been claimed to reduce pain further. We aimed to evaluate this claim.
This was a randomized controlled single-blind clinical trial. Fifty-four patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy at the Department of Surgery, United Christian Hospital, Hong Kong, between July 1997 and September 1998 were randomized into either the study group or the control group. The radially expanding 10-mm trocar was used for the epigastric port in the study group. The conventional 10-mm metal trocar was used similarly in the control group. The operation was otherwise performed with a standardized technique. Another conventional 10-mm metal trocar was used for the subumbilical port for all patients. Pain was measured using a visual analog scale. Pain scores for the epigastric port and subumbilical port were documented for 3 days after the surgery.
There was no difference in age, sex, diagnoses, operating time, or conversion rate. There was consistently no difference in the pain experienced in the subumbilical wound, whereas pain at the epigastric wound was consistently less with the radially expanding trocar (p < 0.05).
The radially expanding trocar produces less early postoperative pain than the conventional metal trocar.
微创手术的一个优点是疼痛较轻。一种径向扩张套管针据称可进一步减轻疼痛。我们旨在评估这一说法。
这是一项随机对照单盲临床试验。1997年7月至1998年9月期间,在香港联合基督教医院外科接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的54例患者被随机分为研究组或对照组。研究组使用径向扩张的10毫米套管针作为上腹部穿刺孔。对照组同样使用传统的10毫米金属套管针。手术的其他操作采用标准化技术。所有患者均使用另一个传统的10毫米金属套管针作为脐下穿刺孔。使用视觉模拟评分法测量疼痛程度。术后3天记录上腹部穿刺孔和脐下穿刺孔的疼痛评分。
两组患者在年龄、性别、诊断、手术时间或中转率方面无差异。脐下伤口的疼痛一直没有差异,而使用径向扩张套管针时,上腹部伤口的疼痛一直较轻(p < 0.05)。
与传统金属套管针相比,径向扩张套管针术后早期疼痛较轻。