GMC's proposals for revalidation would not be accurate, economical, or fair.
作者信息
Wakeford R
出版信息
BMJ. 2000 Nov 11;321(7270):1220.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
GMC's proposals for revalidation would not be accurate, economical, or fair.英国医学总会关于重新认证的提议既不准确、不经济，也不公平。
BMJ. 2000 Nov 11;321(7270):1220.
2
GMC's proposals for revalidation. Effective revalidation system looks at how doctors practise and quality of patients' experience.
BMJ. 2001 Feb 10;322(7282):358-9.
3
GMC's proposals for revalidation. Purpose of revalidation process must be agreed on.英国全科医生委员会（GMC）关于重新认证的提议。重新认证流程的目的必须达成一致。
BMJ. 2001 Feb 10;322(7282):358; author reply 359.
4
GMC's proposals for revalidation. Appraisal is helpful only if done well.
BMJ. 2001 Feb 10;322(7282):358; author reply 359.
5
GMC's revalidation plans don't tackle problem of poorly performing doctors, MPs say.议员们表示，英国医学总会的重新认证计划未能解决表现不佳的医生的问题。
BMJ. 2011 Feb 8;342:d872. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d872.
6
The General Medical Council and the future of revalidation: revalidation process would not pass appraisal.英国医学总会与再认证的未来：再认证流程无法通过评估。
BMJ. 2005 Jun 18;330(7505):1447. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7505.1447-b.
7
Doctor wins battle against GMC's decision to strike him off.医生胜诉，对抗英国医学总会将其除名的决定。
BMJ. 2001 Dec 15;323(7326):1388.
8
The General Medical Council and the future of revalidation: revalidation, discretionary points, clinical excellence awards--steps on the same ladder.英国医学总会与再认证的未来：再认证、酌情加分、临床卓越奖——同一阶梯上的不同阶段
BMJ. 2005 Jun 18;330(7505):1446. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7505.1446-a.
9
Building on the GMC's achievements.基于英国医学总会的成就。
BMJ. 2005 May 21;330(7501):1205-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7501.1205.
10
GMC to consult on next stage of revalidation.英国医学总会将就再认证的下一阶段进行咨询。
BMJ. 2000 May 27;320(7247):1425.
引用本文的文献
1
Revalidation: a critical perspective.重新验证：批判性视角
Br J Gen Pract. 2011 Mar;61(584):166-8. doi: 10.3399/bjgp11X561113.
2
Revalidation: the purpose needs to be clear.重新认证：目的需明确。
BMJ. 2004 Mar 20;328(7441):684-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7441.684.
3
GMC no longer favours folder of evidence for revalidation.英国医学总会不再支持用于重新认证的证据文件夹。
BMJ. 2001 Mar 31;322(7289):792.
4
GMC's proposals for revalidation. Purpose of revalidation process must be agreed on.英国全科医生委员会（GMC）关于重新认证的提议。重新认证流程的目的必须达成一致。
BMJ. 2001 Feb 10;322(7282):358; author reply 359.
本文引用的文献
1
Revalidation in the United Kingdom: general principles based on experience in general practice.英国的再认证：基于全科医疗经验的一般原则
BMJ. 1999 Oct 30;319(7218):1180-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7218.1180.
2
Portfolios in continuing medical education--effective and efficient?继续医学教育中的学习档案袋——有效且高效吗？
Med Educ. 1999 Jul;33(7):521-30. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00407.x.
3
Educational portfolios in the assessment of general practice trainers: reliability of assessors.用于评估全科医生培训师的教育档案袋：评估者的可靠性
Med Educ. 1999 Jul;33(7):515-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00445.x.
4
Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance.使用同行评价来评估医生的表现。
JAMA. 1993 Apr 7;269(13):1655-60.
Zotero 插件