GMC's proposals for revalidation. Purpose of revalidation process must be agreed on.
作者信息
Newble D
出版信息
BMJ. 2001 Feb 10;322(7282):358; author reply 359.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
GMC's proposals for revalidation. Purpose of revalidation process must be agreed on.英国全科医生委员会（GMC）关于重新认证的提议。重新认证流程的目的必须达成一致。
BMJ. 2001 Feb 10;322(7282):358; author reply 359.
2
GMC's proposals for revalidation. Effective revalidation system looks at how doctors practise and quality of patients' experience.
BMJ. 2001 Feb 10;322(7282):358-9.
3
GMC's proposals for revalidation. Appraisal is helpful only if done well.
BMJ. 2001 Feb 10;322(7282):358; author reply 359.
4
GMC's proposals for revalidation would not be accurate, economical, or fair.英国医学总会关于重新认证的提议既不准确、不经济，也不公平。
BMJ. 2000 Nov 11;321(7270):1220.
5
GMC's current proposals for revalidation are flawed.英国医学总会（GMC）目前关于重新认证的提议存在缺陷。
BMJ. 1999 Jul 3;319(7201):53-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7201.53b.
6
UK GPs will be consulted on revalidation proposals.英国全科医生将被征求对重新认证提案的意见。
BMJ. 1999 Sep 25;319(7213):802. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7213.802.
7
Supporting revalidation: methods and evidence.支持重新验证：方法与证据。
Clin Med (Lond). 2005 Sep-Oct;5(5):460-4. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.5-5-460.
8
GMC's revalidation plans don't tackle problem of poorly performing doctors, MPs say.议员们表示，英国医学总会的重新认证计划未能解决表现不佳的医生的问题。
BMJ. 2011 Feb 8;342:d872. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d872.
9
Implementing medical revalidation in the United Kingdom: Findings about organisational changes and impacts from a survey of Responsible Officers.在英国实施医学再认证：对责任官员调查中有关组织变革及影响的调查结果
J R Soc Med. 2017 Jan;110(1):23-30. doi: 10.1177/0141076816683556. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
10
GMC no longer favours folder of evidence for revalidation.英国医学总会不再支持用于重新认证的证据文件夹。
BMJ. 2001 Mar 31;322(7289):792.
引用本文的文献
1
The Evolving Purposes of Medical Revalidation in the United Kingdom: A Qualitative Study of Professional and Regulatory Narratives.英国医学再认证目的的演变：专业和监管叙事的定性研究。
Acad Med. 2018 Apr;93(4):642-647. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001993.
2
Revalidation: the purpose needs to be clear.重新认证：目的需明确。
BMJ. 2004 Mar 20;328(7441):684-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7441.684.
本文引用的文献
1
GMC's proposals for revalidation. Effective revalidation system looks at how doctors practise and quality of patients' experience.
BMJ. 2001 Feb 10;322(7282):358-9.
2
GMC's proposals for revalidation would not be accurate, economical, or fair.英国医学总会关于重新认证的提议既不准确、不经济，也不公平。
BMJ. 2000 Nov 11;321(7270):1220.
3
Validity of final examinations in undergraduate medical training.本科医学培训中期末考试的效度
BMJ. 2000 Nov 11;321(7270):1217-9. doi: 10.1136/bmj.321.7270.1217.
4
Revalidation in the United Kingdom: general principles based on experience in general practice.英国的再认证：基于全科医疗经验的一般原则
BMJ. 1999 Oct 30;319(7218):1180-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.319.7218.1180.
5
Educational portfolios in the assessment of general practice trainers: reliability of assessors.用于评估全科医生培训师的教育档案袋：评估者的可靠性
Med Educ. 1999 Jul;33(7):515-20. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00445.x.
6
MRCGP pass rate by medical school and region of postgraduate training. Royal College of General Practitioners.按医学院校和研究生培训地区划分的MRCGP及格率。皇家全科医师学院。
BMJ. 1993 Aug 28;307(6903):542-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6903.542-a.
7
Use of peer ratings to evaluate physician performance.使用同行评价来评估医生的表现。
JAMA. 1993 Apr 7;269(13):1655-60.
8
LMSSA: a back door entry into medicine?伦敦医学学生外科协会：医学的一条后门途径？
Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1987 Apr 4;294(6576):890-1. doi: 10.1136/bmj.294.6576.890.
Zotero 插件