Burhansstipanov L, Satter D E
Native American Cancer Research (NACR), Pine, CO 80470-7830, USA.
Am J Public Health. 2000 Nov;90(11):1720-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.11.1720.
This commentary provides a brief overview of American Indian and Alaskan populations in the United States and selected data issues. The focus of this commentary is an excerpt of recommendations related to Office of Management and Budget Directive 15 (racial categories) and American Indians and Alaska Natives. Of paramount concern is not only that all federal, state, and local agencies collect data on American Indians and Alaska Natives, but also that reports, findings, and peer-reviewed publications include data on American Indians and Alaska Natives. It is of no use to recruit American Indians and Alaska Natives into studies and projects if their race/ethnicity-specific data are not disseminated. Collapsing racial/ethnic categories, such as Asians, Native Hawaiians and Pacific Islanders, and American Indians and Alaska Natives, into a single racial category of "other" is of no benefit to public health policymakers, researchers, and tribal planners. Likewise, tribal affiliation should be collected whenever it is feasible to do so. Insufficient inclusion and inaccurate identification of American Indians and Alaska Natives in national surveys has also resulted in a dearth of baseline data in significant reports such as Healthy People 2010.
本评论简要概述了美国的美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加人口以及一些特定的数据问题。本评论的重点是与管理和预算办公室第15号指令(种族类别)以及美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民相关的部分建议摘录。至关重要的不仅是所有联邦、州和地方机构都要收集有关美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民的数据,而且报告、研究结果和同行评审出版物都应包含有关美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民的数据。如果不传播针对美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民的特定种族/族裔数据,招募他们参与研究和项目就毫无意义。将种族/族裔类别,如亚洲人、夏威夷原住民和太平洋岛民以及美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民合并为单一的“其他”种族类别,对公共卫生政策制定者、研究人员和部落规划者毫无益处。同样,只要可行,就应收集部落归属信息。在全国性调查中对美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民的纳入不足和识别不准确,也导致了诸如《2010年健康人民》等重要报告中缺乏基线数据。