Biddle A K, Shih Y C, Kwong W J
Department of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7400, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 2000 Nov;20(11):1356-64. doi: 10.1592/phco.20.17.1356.34890.
We performed a systematic assessment of the costs and benefits of sumatriptan and usual therapy for migraine from society's perspective. A decision tree was constructed with probability estimates based on data from an open-label clinical trial assessing the economic and human impacts of sumatriptan and usual therapy on nursing personnel. Direct medical care costs including costs for drug, physician, and emergency room visits were considered. Benefits were estimated using the human capital approach based on the national average of weekly earnings and productivity loss estimated from a migraine clinical trial. The net benefits of sumatriptan and usual therapy for the treatment of a single migraine attack were estimated to be $50 and $20, respectively. The annual incremental net benefit of sumatriptan over usual therapy was estimated to be $114-540/patient. The price difference was offset by benefits of sumatriptan in reducing use of health care resources and productivity loss.
我们从社会角度对舒马曲坦和偏头痛常规疗法的成本与效益进行了系统评估。基于一项开放标签临床试验的数据构建了决策树,该试验评估了舒马曲坦和常规疗法对护理人员的经济和人力影响,并给出了概率估计。考虑了直接医疗护理成本,包括药物、医生诊疗及急诊室就诊费用。效益采用人力资本法进行估算,该方法基于全国平均周收入以及偏头痛临床试验估算的生产力损失。治疗单次偏头痛发作时,舒马曲坦和常规疗法的净效益分别估计为50美元和20美元。舒马曲坦相对于常规疗法的年度增量净效益估计为每位患者114 - 540美元。舒马曲坦在减少医疗资源使用和生产力损失方面的效益抵消了价格差异。