Boucher J, Lewis V, Collis G M
Department of Psychology, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2000 Oct;41(7):847-57.
It is well established that people with autism have impaired face processing, but much less is known about voice processing in autism. Four experiments were therefore carried out to assess (1) familiar voice-face and sound-object matching; (2) familiar voice recognition; (3) unfamiliar voice discrimination; and (4) vocal affect naming and vocal-facial affect matching. In Experiments 1 and 2 language-matched children with specific language impairment (SLI) were the controls. In Experiments 3 and 4 language-matched children with SLI and young mainstream children were the controls. The results were unexpected: the children with autism were not impaired relative to controls on Experiments 1, 2 and 3, and were superior to the children with SLI on both parts of Experiment 4, although impaired on affect matching relative to the mainstream children. These results are interpreted in terms of an unexpected impairment of voice processing in the children with SLI associated partly, but not wholly, with an impairment of cross-modal processing. Performance on the experimental tasks was not associated with verbal or nonverbal ability in either of the clinical groups. The implications of these findings for understanding autism and SLI are discussed.
人们已经充分认识到,自闭症患者的面部处理能力受损,但对于自闭症患者的语音处理能力却知之甚少。因此,开展了四项实验来评估:(1)熟悉的语音-面部和声音-物体匹配;(2)熟悉语音识别;(3)不熟悉语音辨别;以及(4)声音情感命名和声音-面部情感匹配。在实验1和实验2中,与自闭症儿童语言能力相匹配的特定语言障碍(SLI)儿童作为对照组。在实验3和实验4中,与自闭症儿童语言能力相匹配的SLI儿童和主流儿童作为对照组。结果出乎意料:在实验1、2和3中,自闭症儿童相对于对照组没有受损,并且在实验4的两个部分中均优于SLI儿童,尽管在情感匹配方面相对于主流儿童受损。这些结果被解释为,SLI儿童语音处理出现意外受损,部分但并非完全与跨模态处理受损有关。在这两个临床组中,实验任务的表现与言语或非言语能力均无关。讨论了这些发现对于理解自闭症和SLI的意义。