Suppr超能文献

干扰素-β 在多发性硬化症患者中的免疫原性:制剂、剂量、给药频率及给药途径的影响。丹麦多发性硬化症研究组

Immunogenicity of interferon-beta in multiple sclerosis patients: influence of preparation, dosage, dose frequency, and route of administration. Danish Multiple Sclerosis Study Group.

作者信息

Ross C, Clemmesen K M, Svenson M, Sørensen P S, Koch-Henriksen N, Skovgaard G L, Bendtzen K

机构信息

Laboratory for Clinical Interferon Research, Institute for Inflammation Research, Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Ann Neurol. 2000 Nov;48(5):706-12.

Abstract

A total of 754 consecutive patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis were investigated for interferon-beta (IFNbeta) antibodies by protein-G affinity chromatography and antiviral neutralization bioassay during 24 months on 6 MIU (22 microg) of subcutaneous IFNbeta-1a once weekly (n = 143) or three times weekly (n = 160), 6 MIU (30 microg) of intramuscular IFNbeta-1a once weekly (n = 140), or 8 MIU every other day of IFNbeta-1b (n = 311). The proportion of binding antibodies was higher in those receiving IFNbeta-1b compared with 6 MIU of IFNbeta-1a three times weekly (97 vs 89% at 12 months), and fewer became positive if 6 MIU of IFNbeta-1a was administered once weekly (58 vs 89%). Fewer patients on intramuscular than subcutaneous IFNbeta-1a became positive (33 vs 58%). The binding and neutralizing capacities were higher in the IFNbeta-1b group than in the IFNbeta-1a groups; these differences, however, were not significant after 12 months. The number of positive patients varied considerably and depended on the amount of IFN added to the bioassay; adding 10 LU/ml or more masked antibody detection. Antibodies induced by either preparation neutralized both IFNbeta species but not IFNalpha. In conclusion, IFNbeta-induced antibodies are frequently found in multiple sclerosis patients, and IFNbeta-1b is more immunogenic than IFNbeta-1a. The immunogenicity of IFNbeta-1a increases with the frequency of administration and if it is given subcutaneously.

摘要

共对754例复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者进行了研究,在24个月内,分别给予皮下注射6 MIU(22微克)的干扰素β-1a,每周1次(n = 143)或每周3次(n = 160),肌肉注射6 MIU(30微克)的干扰素β-1a,每周1次(n = 140),或隔日注射8 MIU的干扰素β-1b(n = 311),采用蛋白G亲和层析和抗病毒中和生物测定法检测干扰素β(IFNβ)抗体。接受干扰素β-1b治疗的患者中结合抗体的比例高于每周3次给予6 MIU干扰素β-1a的患者(12个月时分别为97%和89%),而每周1次给予6 MIU干扰素β-1a时转为阳性的患者较少(分别为58%和89%)。肌肉注射干扰素β-1a转为阳性的患者少于皮下注射者(分别为33%和58%)。干扰素β-1b组的结合和中和能力高于干扰素β-1a组;然而,12个月后这些差异无统计学意义。阳性患者数量差异很大,取决于生物测定中添加的干扰素量;添加10 LU/ml或更多会掩盖抗体检测。两种制剂诱导的抗体均可中和两种干扰素β,但不能中和干扰素α。总之,多发性硬化症患者中经常发现干扰素β诱导的抗体,且干扰素β-1b比干扰素β-1a更具免疫原性。干扰素β-1a的免疫原性随给药频率增加,且皮下给药时免疫原性更强。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验