Suppr超能文献

抗多发性硬化症生物治疗药物的抗体。

Antidrug Antibodies Against Biological Treatments for Multiple Sclerosis.

机构信息

Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center, Department of Neurology, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

CNS Drugs. 2022 Jun;36(6):569-589. doi: 10.1007/s40263-022-00920-6. Epub 2022 May 19.

Abstract

The development of antidrug antibodies (ADAs) is a major problem in several recombinant protein therapies used in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS). The etiology of ADAs is multifaceted. The predisposition for a breakdown of immune tolerance is probably genetically determined, and many factors may contribute to the immunogenicity, including structural properties, formation of aggregates, and presence of contaminants and impurities from the industrial manufacturing process. ADAs may have a neutralizing capacity and can reduce or abrogate the bioactivity and therapeutic efficacy of the drug and cause safety issues. Interferon (IFN)-β was the first drug approved for the treatment of MS, and-although it is generally recognized that neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) appear and potentially have a negative effect on therapeutic efficacy-the use of routine measurements of NAbs and the interpretation of the presence of NAbs has been debated at length. NAbs appear after 9-18 months of therapy in up to 40% of patients treated with IFNβ, and the frequency and titers of NAbs depend on the IFNβ preparation. Although all pivotal clinical trials of approved IFNβ products in MS exhibited a detrimental effect of NAbs after prolonged therapy, some subsequent studies did not observe clinical effects from NAbs, which led to the claim that NAbs did not matter. However, it is now largely agreed that persistently high titers of NAbs indicate an abrogation of the biological response and, hence, an absence of therapeutic efficacy, and this observation should lead to a change of therapy. Low and medium titers are ambiguous, and treatment decisions should be guided by determination of in vivo messenger RNA myxovirus resistance protein A induction after IFNβ administration and clinical disease activity. During treatment with glatiramer acetate, ADAs occur frequently but do not appear to adversely affect treatment efficacy or result in adverse events. ADAs occur in approximately 5% of patients treated with natalizumab within 6 months of therapy, and persistent NAbs are associated with a lack of efficacy and acute infusion-related reactions and should instigate a change of therapy. When using the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies ocrelizumab and ofatumumab in the treatment of MS, it is not necessary to test for NAbs as these occur very infrequently. Alemtuzumab is immunogenic, but routine measurements of ADAs are not recommended as the antibodies in the pivotal 2-year trials at the population level did not influence lymphocyte depletion or repopulation, efficacy, or safety. However, in some individuals, NAbs led to poor lymphocyte depletion.

摘要

抗药物抗体 (ADAs) 的产生是多发性硬化症 (MS) 多种重组蛋白治疗中存在的一个主要问题。ADAs 的产生原因是多方面的。免疫耐受的破坏倾向可能是由遗传决定的,许多因素可能会导致免疫原性,包括结构特性、聚集的形成以及工业制造过程中污染物和杂质的存在。ADAs 可能具有中和能力,可降低或消除药物的生物活性和治疗效果,并引起安全问题。干扰素 (IFN)-β 是第一种获批用于治疗 MS 的药物,尽管人们普遍认为中和抗体 (NAbs) 会出现并可能对治疗效果产生负面影响,但关于 NAbs 的常规检测和对 NAbs 存在的解释一直存在争议。在接受 IFNβ 治疗的患者中,高达 40%的患者在治疗 9-18 个月后出现 NAbs,并且 NAbs 的频率和滴度取决于 IFNβ 的制剂。尽管 MS 获批 IFNβ 产品的所有关键临床试验均表明长期治疗后 NAbs 具有有害影响,但随后的一些研究并未观察到 NAbs 的临床效果,这导致有人声称 NAbs 无关紧要。然而,目前人们普遍认为,持续高滴度的 NAbs 表明生物反应被阻断,因此治疗效果缺失,这一观察结果应导致治疗方法的改变。低滴度和中滴度的情况则较为模糊,治疗决策应根据 IFNβ 给药后信使 RNA 抗流感病毒蛋白 A 的诱导和临床疾病活动来确定。在使用醋酸格拉替雷治疗期间,ADAs 经常发生,但似乎不会对治疗效果产生不利影响,也不会导致不良事件。在接受那他珠单抗治疗的患者中,大约有 5%的患者在治疗 6 个月内出现 NAbs,持续存在的 NAbs 与疗效缺失以及急性输注相关反应相关,应促使改变治疗方案。在使用抗 CD20 单克隆抗体奥瑞珠单抗和奥法妥木单抗治疗 MS 时,无需检测 NAbs,因为这些抗体很少发生。阿仑单抗具有免疫原性,但不建议常规检测 ADAs,因为在关键性的为期 2 年的试验中,人群水平的抗体并未影响淋巴细胞耗竭或再增殖、疗效或安全性。然而,在某些个体中,NAbs 导致淋巴细胞耗竭不良。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验