Suppr超能文献

The new peer review.

作者信息

Kohane I S, Altman R B

机构信息

Children's Hospital Informatics Program, Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, USA.

出版信息

Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:433-7.

Abstract

It is widely recognized that the Internet has fundamentally changed the dynamics of publication, and in particular, it is clear that there is no effective way to control the release of any web-based publication. The scientific and lay literature is now accessible to the public with unprecedented ease Recent proposals to start a life sciences online repository of preprints highlights the trend towards "publish first, review later" that seems to be emerging. Does this mean that the peer review process is dead? It certainly suggests that there is a need for a change in how the process works. We discuss currently available technologies to enable the implementation of new, distributed peer review process benefiting multiple user communities.

摘要

相似文献

1
The new peer review.
Proc AMIA Symp. 2000:433-7.
2
Journals under pressure: publish, and be damned.
Nature. 2002 Oct 24;419(6909):772-6. doi: 10.1038/419772a.
3
The peer review process (aka peer reviewology).
Biol Res Nurs. 2002 Oct;4(2):71-2. doi: 10.1177/1099800402238328.
4
Journals submit to scrutiny of their peer-review process.
Nature. 2006 Jan 19;439(7074):252. doi: 10.1038/439252b.
5
[How to reward and stimulate the task of reviewing scientific articles?].
Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2007 Jan-Feb;70(1):5. doi: 10.1590/s0004-27492007000100001.
6
The politics of publication.
Nature. 2003 Mar 20;422(6929):259-61. doi: 10.1038/422259a.
7
Learning to review.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;70(11):1599-600. doi: 10.4088/JCP.09com05628whi.
8
Peer review and appeal: flawed but trusted?
Lancet. 2003 Aug 30;362(9385):747. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14218-3.
9
Open-access journal will publish first, judge later.
Nature. 2007 Jan 4;445(7123):9. doi: 10.1038/445009a.
10
Publishers soldier on despite electronic bugs.
Nature. 2002 Jul 18;418(6895):264. doi: 10.1038/418264a.

引用本文的文献

1
The undeclared use of third-party service providers in academic publishing is unethical: an epistemic reflection and scoping review.
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024 Dec;397(12):9435-9447. doi: 10.1007/s00210-024-03177-6. Epub 2024 Jul 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验