• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对首次接受心脏手术的男性患者,通过同伴支持进行替代性体验的随机对照试验:对焦虑、自我效能期望和自我报告活动的影响。

A randomized, controlled trial of vicarious experience through peer support for male first-time cardiac surgery patients: impact on anxiety, self-efficacy expectation, and self-reported activity.

作者信息

Parent N, Fortin F

机构信息

Montreal Heart Institute, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Heart Lung. 2000 Nov-Dec;29(6):389-400. doi: 10.1067/mhl.2000.110626.

DOI:10.1067/mhl.2000.110626
PMID:11080319
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to determine whether vicarious experience, in which former patients exemplify the active lives they are leading, reduces anxiety and increases self-efficacy expectation and self-reported activity in patients after cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

A randomized, controlled trial was used to evaluate an intervention that linked volunteers who had recovered from cardiac surgery in dyadic support with patients about to undergo similar surgery. The linking was achieved by means of visits during the hospitalization and recovery period.

SUBJECTS

Fifty-six first-time male patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, with a mean age of 56.5 years, were randomly assigned to an experimental (n = 27) or control group (n = 29).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Anxiety was measured at 48 hours and 24 hours before surgery, and again at 5 days and 4 weeks after surgery. Self-efficacy expectation and self-reported activity were both evaluated at 5 days and 4 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

Only the experimental group showed a significant decrease in anxiety during hospitalization. At all measurement times after the first intervention, the experimental group reported significantly lower levels of anxiety compared with the control group. The experimental group reported significantly higher levels of self-efficacy expectation and self-reported activity for general activities, walking, and climbing stairs evaluated at 5 days, and for general activities at 4 weeks after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Vicarious experience provided through dyadic support is effective in helping patients undergoing cardiac surgery cope with surgical anxiety and in improving self-efficacy expectations and self-reported activity after surgery. Dyadic support is a valuable tool for recovery from cardiac surgery that needs to be maintained and explored through nursing practice and research.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定替代性经验(即康复患者展示其积极的生活状态)是否能减轻心脏手术后患者的焦虑,提高自我效能期望,并增加自我报告的活动量。

设计

采用随机对照试验来评估一项干预措施,该措施将心脏手术康复的志愿者与即将接受类似手术的患者进行配对支持。通过在住院和康复期间的探访来实现配对。

对象

56名首次接受冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)的男性患者,平均年龄56.5岁,被随机分为实验组(n = 27)或对照组(n = 29)。

观察指标

在手术前48小时和24小时测量焦虑水平,术后5天和4周再次测量。在术后5天和4周评估自我效能期望和自我报告的活动量。

结果

只有实验组在住院期间焦虑水平显著降低。在首次干预后的所有测量时间点,与对照组相比,实验组报告的焦虑水平显著更低。在术后5天评估的一般活动、步行和爬楼梯方面,以及术后4周评估的一般活动方面,实验组报告的自我效能期望和自我报告的活动量显著更高。

结论

通过配对支持提供的替代性经验有效地帮助心脏手术患者应对手术焦虑,并提高术后自我效能期望和自我报告的活动量。配对支持是心脏手术康复的一种有价值的工具,需要通过护理实践和研究加以维持和探索。

相似文献

1
A randomized, controlled trial of vicarious experience through peer support for male first-time cardiac surgery patients: impact on anxiety, self-efficacy expectation, and self-reported activity.一项针对首次接受心脏手术的男性患者,通过同伴支持进行替代性体验的随机对照试验:对焦虑、自我效能期望和自我报告活动的影响。
Heart Lung. 2000 Nov-Dec;29(6):389-400. doi: 10.1067/mhl.2000.110626.
2
[Social support intervention by former model patients for persons undergoing heart surgery].
Rech Soins Infirm. 1997 Dec(51):59-100.
3
Enhancing the efficacy of heart surgery by optimizing patients' preoperative expectations: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial.通过优化患者术前预期来提高心脏手术疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Am Heart J. 2013 Jan;165(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.007. Epub 2012 Nov 14.
4
A randomized trial of dyadic peer support intervention for newly diagnosed breast cancer patients in Korea.一项针对韩国新诊断乳腺癌患者的对偶同伴支持干预的随机试验。
Cancer Nurs. 2013 May-Jun;36(3):E15-22. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182642d7c.
5
Effects of a peer education on cardiac self-efficacy and readmissions in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomized-controlled trial.同伴教育对冠状动脉搭桥手术患者心脏自我效能感及再入院率的影响:一项随机对照试验
Nurs Crit Care. 2017 Jan;22(1):19-28. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12118. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
6
Predicting completeness of symptom relief after major heart surgery.预测心脏大手术后症状缓解的完整性。
Behav Med. 1996 Summer;22(2):45-57. doi: 10.1080/08964289.1996.9933764.
7
Senior peer counseling by telephone for psychosocial support after breast cancer surgery: effects at six months.乳腺癌手术后通过电话进行的老年同伴心理社会支持咨询:六个月时的效果
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2012 Jan;39(1):78-89. doi: 10.1188/12.ONF.78-89.
8
A randomized clinical trial of nursing care for recovery from cardiac surgery.心脏手术后康复护理的一项随机临床试验。
Heart Lung. 1993 Mar-Apr;22(2):125-33.
9
Effects of a home-based intervention program on anxiety and depression 6 months after coronary artery bypass grafting: a randomized controlled trial.一项基于家庭的干预项目对冠状动脉搭桥术后6个月焦虑和抑郁的影响:一项随机对照试验。
J Psychosom Res. 2007 Apr;62(4):411-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2006.11.010.
10
The effect of dyadic intervention on self-efficacy, social support, and depression for men with prostate cancer.二元干预对前列腺癌男性患者自我效能感、社会支持和抑郁的影响。
Psychooncology. 2004 Jan;13(1):47-60. doi: 10.1002/pon.718.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of Peer-Delivered Practice Intervention with Fostering Walking Leaders for Participation in Healthy Walking Activities and Awareness of the Community Walking Environment.同伴提供的实践干预对培养步行带头人参与健康步行活动及社区步行环境认知的影响。
J Lifestyle Med. 2025 Aug 31;15(2):41-47. doi: 10.15280/jlm.2025.15.2.41.
2
Heart2Heart: a digital peer support programme for people with heart disease: protocol for a community-based, investigator-blinded randomised controlled trial conducted in Australia.心连心:一项针对心脏病患者的数字同伴支持计划:在澳大利亚进行的基于社区的、研究者设盲的随机对照试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Feb 13;15(2):e088740. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088740.
3
Assessing the impact of the iPeer2Peer program for adolescents with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a mixed-methods randomized controlled trial.
评估iPeer2Peer项目对青少年特发性关节炎青少年的影响:一项混合方法随机对照试验。
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2024 Dec 27;22(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12969-024-01052-5.
4
The Effect of Peer-Mentor Support for Older Vulnerable Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease-A 24-Week Randomized Controlled Trial.同伴指导对老年缺血性心脏病弱势患者的影响——一项为期24周的随机对照试验。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2025;40(5):486-497. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0000000000001158. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
5
Association Between Preoperative Patient Resilience and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Rotator Cuff Repair.肩袖修复术前患者恢复力与患者报告结局之间的关联
Orthop J Sports Med. 2024 Jun 12;12(6):23259671241255400. doi: 10.1177/23259671241255400. eCollection 2024 Jun.
6
Characterizing the Use of Healthcare Access Supports Among People Who Use Drugs in Vancouver, Canada, 2017 to 2020: A Cohort Study.2017 年至 2020 年加拿大温哥华吸毒人群的医疗保健准入支持使用特征:一项队列研究。
Subst Use Addctn J. 2024 Oct;45(4):653-663. doi: 10.1177/29767342241249870. Epub 2024 May 28.
7
Peer-support interventions and related outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction: A systematic review.心肌梗死患者的同伴支持干预及相关结果:一项系统综述。
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 26;10(3):e25314. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25314. eCollection 2024 Feb 15.
8
Social network interventions to support cardiac rehabilitation and secondary prevention in the management of people with heart disease.社交网络干预措施在心脏病患者的心脏康复和二级预防管理中的应用。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jun 28;6(6):CD013820. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013820.pub2.
9
Virtual training of rheumatoid arthritis peer coaches in motivational interviewing skills and concepts of cardiovascular disease.类风湿关节炎同伴教练在动机性访谈技巧和心血管疾病概念方面的虚拟培训。
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2023 Apr 5;33:101130. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2023.101130. eCollection 2023 Jun.
10
What is the volume, diversity and nature of recent, robust evidence for the use of peer support in health and social care? An evidence and gap map.近期关于在健康和社会护理中使用同伴支持的有力证据的数量、多样性和性质是什么?一份证据与差距图。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 26;18(3):e1264. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1264. eCollection 2022 Sep.