Sesso H D, Stampfer M J, Rosner B, Hennekens C H, Gaziano J M, Manson J E, Glynn R J
Division of Preventive Medicine, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Hypertension. 2000 Nov;36(5):801-7. doi: 10.1161/01.hyp.36.5.801.
We compared systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), pulse pressure (PP), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) in predicting the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), stratifying results at age 60 years, when DBP decreases while SBP continues to increase. We prospectively followed 11 150 male physicians with no history of CVD or antihypertensive treatment through the 2-year questionnaire, after which follow-up began. Reported blood pressure was averaged from both the baseline and 2-year questionnaires. During a median follow-up of 10.8 years, there were 905 cases of incident CVD. For men aged <60 years (n=8743), those in the highest versus lowest quartiles of average SBP (>/=130 versus <116 mm Hg), DBP (>/=81 versus <73 mm Hg), and MAP (>/=97 versus <88 mm Hg) had relative risks (RRs) of CVD of 2.16, 2.23, and 2.52, respectively. Models with average MAP and PP did not add information compared with models with MAP alone (P>0.05). For men aged >/=60 years (n=2407), those in the highest versus lowest quartiles of average SBP (>/=135 versus <120 mm Hg), PP (>/=55 versus <44 mm Hg), and MAP (>/=99 versus <91 mm Hg) had RRs of CVD of 1.69, 1.83, and 1.43, respectively. The addition of other blood pressure measures did not add information compared with average SBP or PP alone (all P>0.05). These data suggest that average SBP, DBP, and MAP strongly predict CVD among younger men, whereas either average SBP or PP predicts CVD among older men. More research should distinguish whether MAP, highly correlated with SBP and DBP, better predicts CVD.
我们比较了收缩压(SBP)、舒张压(DBP)、脉压(PP)和平均动脉压(MAP)在预测心血管疾病(CVD)风险方面的作用,并在60岁时进行分层分析,此时舒张压下降而收缩压持续上升。我们对11150名无心血管疾病史或未接受过抗高血压治疗的男性医生进行了前瞻性随访,通过为期2年的问卷调查,之后开始随访。报告的血压取基线问卷和2年问卷的平均值。在中位随访10.8年期间,有905例新发心血管疾病病例。对于年龄<60岁的男性(n = 8743),平均收缩压最高四分位数与最低四分位数(≥130 vs <116 mmHg)、舒张压(≥81 vs <73 mmHg)和平均动脉压(≥97 vs <88 mmHg)的人群发生心血管疾病的相对风险(RRs)分别为2.16、2.23和2.52。与仅使用平均动脉压的模型相比,使用平均动脉压和脉压的模型没有增加预测信息(P>0.05)。对于年龄≥60岁的男性(n = 2407),平均收缩压最高四分位数与最低四分位数(≥135 vs <120 mmHg)、脉压(≥55 vs <44 mmHg)和平均动脉压(≥99 vs <91 mmHg)的人群发生心血管疾病的RRs分别为1.69、1.83和1.43。与单独使用平均收缩压或脉压相比,添加其他血压指标并没有增加预测信息(所有P>0.05)。这些数据表明,平均收缩压、舒张压和平均动脉压能有力地预测年轻男性的心血管疾病,而平均收缩压或脉压能预测老年男性的心血管疾病。更多研究应区分与收缩压和舒张压高度相关的平均动脉压是否能更好地预测心血管疾病。