Ylikarjula J, Alaja S, Laakso J, Tesar D
Systems Analysis Laboratory, Helsinki University of Technology, HUT, FIN-02015, Finland.
J Theor Biol. 2000 Dec 7;207(3):377-87. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2181.
In this paper, we examine the effects of patch number and different dispersal patterns on dynamics of local populations and on the level of synchrony between them. Local population renewal is governed by the Ricker model and we also consider asymmetrical dispersal as well as the presence of environmental heterogeneity. Our results show that both population dynamics and the level of synchrony differ markedly between two and a larger number of local populations. For two patches different dispersal rules give very versatile dynamics. However, for a larger number of local populations the dynamics are similar irrespective of the dispersal rule. For example, for the parameter values yielding stable or periodic dynamics in a single population, the dynamics do not change when the patches are coupled with dispersal. High intensity of dispersal does not guarantee synchrony between local populations. The level of synchrony depends also on dispersal rule, the number of local populations, and the intrinsic rate of increase. In our study, the effects of density-independent and density-dependent dispersal rules do not show any consistent difference. The results call for caution when drawing general conclusions from models of only two interacting populations and question the applicability of a large number of theoretical papers dealing with two local populations.
在本文中,我们研究了斑块数量和不同扩散模式对局部种群动态及其之间同步水平的影响。局部种群更新由里克模型控制,我们还考虑了不对称扩散以及环境异质性的存在。我们的结果表明,两个局部种群和更多局部种群之间的种群动态和同步水平存在显著差异。对于两个斑块,不同的扩散规则会产生非常多样的动态。然而,对于更多局部种群,无论扩散规则如何,动态都是相似的。例如,对于在单个种群中产生稳定或周期性动态的参数值,当斑块通过扩散耦合时,动态不会改变。高强度的扩散并不能保证局部种群之间的同步。同步水平还取决于扩散规则、局部种群数量和内在增长率。在我们的研究中,密度独立和密度依赖扩散规则的影响没有显示出任何一致的差异。这些结果提醒我们,在仅从两个相互作用种群的模型得出一般性结论时要谨慎,并质疑大量处理两个局部种群的理论论文的适用性。