Beynon C, Burke J, Doran D, Nevill A
Research Institute for Sport and Exercise Sciences, Liverpool John Moores University, UK.
Ergonomics. 2000 Oct;43(10):1763-70. doi: 10.1080/001401300750004168.
Workers in physically demanding occupations require rest breaks to recover from physiological stress and biomechanical loading. Physiological stress can increase the risk of developing musculoskeletal disorders and repeated loading of the spine may increase the potential for incurring back pain. The aim of the study was to assess the impact of an altered activity-rest schedule on physiological and spinal loading in hospital-based porters. An existing 4-h activity-rest schedule was obtained from observations on eight male porters. This schedule formed the normal trial, which included two 5- and one 15-min breaks. An alternative 4-h schedule was proposed (experimental condition) that had two breaks each of 12.5 min. It was hypothesized that the experimental trial is more effective in promoting recovery from physiological strain and spinal shrinkage than the normal trial, due to the 5-min breaks being insufficient to allow physiological variables to return to resting levels or the intervertebral discs to reabsorb fluid. Ten males performed both test conditions and oxygen uptake VO2, heart rate, minute ventilation VE, perceived exertion and spinal shrinkage were recorded. There were no significant differences in any of the measured variables between the two trials (p > 0.05). Median heart rates were 78 (range 71-93) and 82 (71-90) beats.min(-1) for the normal trial and the experimental trial respectively, indicating that the activity was of low intensity. The light intensity was corroborated by the oxygen uptakes (0.75, range 0.65-0.94 1.min(-1)). Spinal shrinkage occurred to the same extent in the two trials (2.12 +/- 3.16 mm and 2.88 +/- 2.92 mm in the normal trial and the experimental trial respectively). Varying the length and positioning of the rest breaks did not significantly affect the physiological responses or magnitude of spinal shrinkage between the two trials. More physically demanding work than the porters' schedule should induce greater physiological fatigue and spinal shrinkage. The ratio between activity and rest breaks would then become more important.
从事体力要求较高职业的工人需要休息来从生理压力和生物力学负荷中恢复。生理压力会增加患肌肉骨骼疾病的风险,而脊柱的反复负荷可能会增加背痛的可能性。本研究的目的是评估改变活动-休息时间表对医院搬运工生理和脊柱负荷的影响。通过对八名男性搬运工的观察,获得了现有的4小时活动-休息时间表。该时间表构成了正常试验,其中包括两次5分钟和一次15分钟的休息。提出了另一种4小时的时间表(实验条件),有两次各12.5分钟的休息。据推测,由于5分钟的休息不足以使生理变量恢复到休息水平或椎间盘重新吸收液体,实验性试验在促进从生理应变和脊柱收缩中恢复方面比正常试验更有效。十名男性进行了两种测试条件,并记录了摄氧量VO2、心率、分钟通气量VE、主观用力程度和脊柱收缩情况。两次试验中任何测量变量均无显著差异(p>0.05)。正常试验和实验性试验的平均心率分别为78(范围71-93)和82(71-90)次·分钟-1,表明活动强度较低。摄氧量(0.75,范围0.65-0.94升·分钟-1)也证实了活动强度较低。两次试验中脊柱收缩程度相同(正常试验和实验性试验分别为2.12±3.16毫米和2.88±2.92毫米)。改变休息时间的长度和位置并没有显著影响两次试验之间的生理反应或脊柱收缩程度。比搬运工时间表要求更高体力的工作应该会导致更大的生理疲劳和脊柱收缩。那么活动和休息时间的比例就会变得更加重要。