Dababneh A J, Swanson N, Shell R L
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Robert A. Taft Laboratories, Cincinnati, OH 45226-1998, USA.
Ergonomics. 2001 Feb 10;44(2):164-74. doi: 10.1080/00140130121538.
The impact of frequent short rest breaks on the productivity and well being of a group of 30 workers in a meat-processing plant was studied. Two rest break schedules were tested, both of which provided 36 min of extra break time over the regular break schedule (30-min lunch and two 15-min breaks). In the first experimental rest break schedule, workers were given 12 3-min breaks evenly distributed over the workday (3-min break for every 27 min of work). In the second schedule, workers were given four 9-min breaks evenly distributed over the workday (9-min break every 51 min of work). Outcome measures included production rate and discomfort and stress ratings. Results showed that neither of the two experimental rest break schedules had a negative effect on production, and the 9-min break schedule improved discomfort ratings for the lower extremities. The workers in the study mostly preferred the 9-min rest break schedule, indicating that workers in general might not as readily accept fragmentation of break time into short, frequent breaks.
研究了频繁短暂休息对一家肉类加工厂30名工人的生产率和幸福感的影响。测试了两种休息时间表,两种时间表都比常规休息时间表(30分钟午餐和两次15分钟休息)多提供36分钟的额外休息时间。在第一个实验性休息时间表中,工人在工作日内均匀分布地获得12次3分钟的休息(每工作27分钟休息3分钟)。在第二个时间表中,工人在工作日内均匀分布地获得4次9分钟的休息(每工作51分钟休息9分钟)。结果指标包括生产率以及不适和压力评级。结果表明,两种实验性休息时间表都没有对生产产生负面影响,并且9分钟休息时间表改善了下肢的不适评级。该研究中的工人大多更喜欢9分钟休息时间表,这表明一般来说,工人可能不太容易接受将休息时间分割成短而频繁的休息。