Leoncini M, Marcucci G, Sciagrà R, Frascarelli F, Traini A M, Mondanelli D, Magni M, Bini L, Bellandi F, Mennuti A, Dabizzi R P
Division of Cardiology, Misericordia e Dolce Hospital, Prato, Italy.
J Nucl Cardiol. 2000 Sep-Oct;7(5):426-31. doi: 10.1067/mnc.2000.108029.
The value of gated single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in the assessment of wall motion (WM) in patients with severe perfusion defects and in the evaluation of low-dose dobutamine (LDD)-induced changes is not yet established. In patients with chronic coronary artery disease who have left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, the results of nitrate-enhanced technetium 99m sestamibi (sestamibi) gated SPECT for the evaluation of resting and LDD WM were compared with those of baseline and LDD echocardiography (LDDE).
Thirty-seven patients underwent echocardiography and nitrate-enhanced sestamibi gated SPECT within 1 week at rest and during LDD infusion. WM was scored from 1 (normal) to 4 (dyskinetic) by using a 16-segment model. Segments with sestamibi uptake less than 30% were considered unsuitable for WM analysis (36 of 592 segments). Echocardiography was technically unreliable in 10 of 592 segments. The precise agreement between echocardiography and gated SPECT for baseline regional WM was 68.4% (kappa = 0.54), without significant differences for the involved coronary artery territory. The agreement for +/- 1 WM scoring was 96.5% (kappa = 0.94). Contractile reserve during LDD was detected by means of echocardiography in 36% and by means of sestamibi gated SPECT in 33% of baseline asynergic segments. Agreement for detection of WM improvement in response to LDD was 74% (kappa = 0.41). The overall and +/-1 WM score agreement for LDD WM was 67.5% (kappa = 0.50) and 94.7% (kappa = 0.91), respectively. A significant correlation between echocardiography and gated SPECT was observed for both baseline (p = 0.78) and LDD (p = 0.74) WM score index.
In patients with coronary artery disease who have LV dysfunction, nitrate-enhanced sestamibi gated SPECT allows a reliable WM evaluation, both at rest and during LDD infusion, in almost all segments and provides results in agreement with LDDE.
门控单光子发射计算机断层扫描(SPECT)在评估严重灌注缺损患者的室壁运动(WM)以及评价低剂量多巴酚丁胺(LDD)诱发变化中的价值尚未明确。在患有左心室(LV)功能障碍的慢性冠状动脉疾病患者中,将硝酸酯增强的锝99m甲氧基异丁基异腈(sestamibi)门控SPECT用于评估静息和LDD状态下WM的结果与基线和LDD超声心动图(LDDE)的结果进行了比较。
37例患者在1周内于静息状态及LDD输注期间接受了超声心动图检查和硝酸酯增强的sestamibi门控SPECT检查。采用16节段模型将WM从1分(正常)到4分(运动障碍)进行评分。sestamibi摄取低于30%的节段被认为不适用于WM分析(592个节段中的36个)。在592个节段中,有10个节段的超声心动图在技术上不可靠。超声心动图与门控SPECT在基线区域WM方面的精确一致性为68.4%(kappa = 0.54),在所涉及的冠状动脉区域无显著差异。+/-1分WM评分的一致性为96.5%(kappa = 0.94)。在基线无运动节段中,通过超声心动图检测到36%的节段在LDD期间有收缩储备,通过sestamibi门控SPECT检测到33%的节段有收缩储备。对LDD诱发的WM改善的检测一致性为74%(kappa = 0.4)。LDD状态下WM的总体及+/-1分WM评分一致性分别为67.5%(kappa = 0.50)和94.7%(kappa = 0.91)。在基线(p = 0.78)和LDD(p = 0.74)状态下,超声心动图与门控SPECT的WM评分指数之间均观察到显著相关性。
在患有LV功能障碍的冠状动脉疾病患者中,硝酸酯增强的sestamibi门控SPECT在静息和LDD输注期间几乎对所有节段都能进行可靠的WM评估,且结果与LDDE一致。