Nakamura T, Fukui A, Maeda M, Kugai M, Inada Y, Teramoto N, Ishida A, Tamai S
Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Kokuho Central Hospital and Nara Medical University, Shiki, Japan.
J Reconstr Microsurg. 2000 Oct;16(7):577-84. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-8399.
The authors performed anastomoses of small vessels with the Nd-YAG laser, comparing these with conventional suture anastomoses. Some arteries were sutured with 10-0 nylon with about eight suture sites, and others were held by stay sutures at three points with laser irradiation performed between them. Two surgeons performed the anastomoses in the same way. The first was well-trained and experienced, and the second was technically inexperienced. The authors evaluated clamping time, patency rate, and endoscopic and histologic findings. The patency rate of the first surgeon was 100 percent (30/30) in the suture anastomoses and was 97 percent (29/30) in the laser anastomoses. For the second surgeon, the rates were 60 percent (18/30) in the suture group and 80 percent (24/30) in the laser group. On histologic examination, the suture group showed inflammatory cells around the suture site at the fourth week after the operation. In the laser group, an inflammatory reaction around the suture material was observed, but the other areas recovered. For the experienced surgeon, the patency rate and clamping time of the laser anastomosis provided no statistically significant difference to those of the suture anastomosis. On the other hand, for the inexperienced surgeon, the patency rate of the laser anastomosis was superior to that of the suture anastomosis, and the clamping time of the laser anastomosis was shorter than that of the suture anastomosis. Therefore, the authors concluded that the Nd-YAG laser anastomosis is useful for small vessels.
作者使用Nd-YAG激光进行小血管吻合,并将其与传统缝合吻合进行比较。一些动脉用10-0尼龙线缝合,约有八个缝合点,另一些则在三个点用牵引缝线固定,在两点之间进行激光照射。两位外科医生以相同方式进行吻合。第一位训练有素且经验丰富,第二位技术上缺乏经验。作者评估了夹闭时间、通畅率以及内镜和组织学检查结果。第一位外科医生的缝合吻合通畅率为100%(30/30),激光吻合通畅率为97%(29/30)。对于第二位外科医生,缝合组的通畅率为60%(18/30),激光组为80%(24/30)。组织学检查显示,缝合组在术后第四周缝合部位周围有炎症细胞。在激光组中,观察到缝合材料周围有炎症反应,但其他区域已恢复。对于经验丰富的外科医生,激光吻合的通畅率和夹闭时间与缝合吻合相比无统计学显著差异。另一方面,对于缺乏经验的外科医生,激光吻合的通畅率优于缝合吻合,且激光吻合的夹闭时间比缝合吻合短。因此,作者得出结论,Nd-YAG激光吻合术对小血管有用。