Zdolsek Johann, Ledin Håkan, Lidman Disa
Department of Plastic Surgery, Hand Surgery, and Burns, University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden.
Microsurgery. 2005;25(8):596-8. doi: 10.1002/micr.20172.
Sutured anastomoses of small vessels are considered difficult to learn. Mechanical anastomosis systems allow a more rapidly performed anastomosis. In order to compare the process of learning to perform sutured and mechanical microvascular anastomoses, two surgeons, with limited microvascular experience, performed 30 aortic and 30 femoral vein anastomoses in 30 Wistar rats. The methods compared were conventional suture, vascular closure system (VCS) and microvascular anastomatic coupler system (MAC). There were no inter-surgeon differences regarding patency or time to perform anastomoses. The average time to perform a suture anastomosis was 39 min (patency 80%). Anastomoses with the VCS system took 24 min (patency 25%), whereas the MAC couplers took 13 min to perform (patency 95%). There was a significant learning effect with sutures, but no obvious reduction in time to perform MAC coupler or VCS clip anastomoses was seen. MAC couplers were easiest to use, and allowed us to perform rapid anastomoses with high patency.
小血管的缝合吻合术被认为很难掌握。机械吻合系统能使吻合术进行得更快。为了比较学习进行缝合微血管吻合术和机械微血管吻合术的过程,两名微血管经验有限的外科医生在30只Wistar大鼠身上进行了30次主动脉和30次股静脉吻合术。比较的方法有传统缝合、血管闭合系统(VCS)和微血管吻合耦合器系统(MAC)。在吻合术的通畅率或操作时间方面,两位外科医生之间没有差异。进行缝合吻合术的平均时间为39分钟(通畅率80%)。使用VCS系统进行吻合术需要24分钟(通畅率25%),而使用MAC耦合器进行吻合术需要13分钟(通畅率95%)。缝合有显著的学习效应,但使用MAC耦合器或VCS夹进行吻合术的时间没有明显缩短。MAC耦合器最容易使用,能让我们进行快速且通畅率高的吻合术。