• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标准产科记录图表系统:一种新型电子病历的评估

Standard obstetric record charting system: evaluation of a new electronic medical record.

作者信息

Nielsen P E, Thomson B A, Jackson R B, Kosman K, Kiley K C

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington 98431, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Dec;96(6):1003-8. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01073-5.

DOI:10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01073-5
PMID:11084193
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop, implement, and evaluate an electronic record that tracks antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum care.

METHODS

The Standard Obstetric Record Charting system (STORC) was created by a group of programmers and clinicians who developed screen designs, reports, pick lists, and standard notes, and ensured a flexible, yet standard system. To evaluate data within the system, ORYX (Joint Commission) performance measures were collected retrospectively and compared with STORC data.

RESULTS

The STORC, officially implemented as our complete inpatient and outpatient obstetric record in March 1998, provided seamless integration of antepartum, intrapartum, and postpartum care records, standard forms, and standard and ad hoc reports. Data for customizable case and procedure lists are generated easily. Unplanned and total cesarean deliveries were identified retrospectively in 0% (0 of 18) of charts reviewed for ORYX; however, STORC identified the actual rates of each as 8.3% (23 of 276) and 12.3% (34 of 276), respectively. Other critical ORYX measures not identified by retrospective data collection, but accurately provided by STORC, included rates of third and fourth degree lacerations, postpartum hemorrhage, low and extremely low birth weights, and macrosomia.

CONCLUSION

After implementation in a large referral center, completeness and accuracy of charting and rapid access to obstetric outcome data were improved. Provider acceptance of the system also was dramatic and improved over time as a result of direct development oversight by obstetric health care providers, local control of system changes, and immediate access to outcome data. (Obstet Gynecol 2000;96:1003-8.)

摘要

目的

开发、实施并评估一个跟踪产前、产时及产后护理的电子记录系统。

方法

标准产科记录图表系统(STORC)由一组程序员和临床医生创建,他们设计了屏幕界面、报告、选择列表和标准注释,并确保该系统灵活且标准化。为评估系统内的数据,回顾性收集了(联合委员会的)ORYX绩效指标,并与STORC数据进行比较。

结果

STORC于1998年3月正式作为我们完整的住院和门诊产科记录实施,实现了产前、产时及产后护理记录、标准表格以及标准和临时报告的无缝整合。可轻松生成可定制的病例和手术列表数据。在为ORYX审查的图表中,回顾性发现计划外剖宫产和总剖宫产率均为0%(18例中0例);然而,STORC确定实际发生率分别为8.3%(276例中23例)和12.3%(276例中34例)。其他未通过回顾性数据收集识别但STORC准确提供的关键ORYX指标包括三度和四度会阴裂伤率、产后出血率、低出生体重和极低出生体重率以及巨大儿发生率。

结论

在一个大型转诊中心实施后,图表记录的完整性和准确性以及对产科结局数据的快速获取得到了改善。由于产科医疗保健提供者的直接开发监督、系统更改的本地控制以及对结局数据的即时访问,随着时间的推移,提供者对该系统的接受度也显著提高且有所改善。(《妇产科学》2000年;96:1003 - 8)

相似文献

1
Standard obstetric record charting system: evaluation of a new electronic medical record.标准产科记录图表系统:一种新型电子病历的评估
Obstet Gynecol. 2000 Dec;96(6):1003-8. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01073-5.
2
Obstetric and neonatal characteristics of pregnancy and delivery for infant birthweight ≥5.0 kg.出生体重≥5.0千克婴儿的妊娠及分娩的产科和新生儿特征
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2017 Dec;30(24):2961-2965. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2016.1269318. Epub 2017 Jan 4.
3
Effectiveness of nurses as providers of birth labor support in North American hospitals: a randomized controlled trial.北美医院中护士作为分娩支持提供者的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
JAMA. 2002 Sep 18;288(11):1373-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.11.1373.
4
Labor and delivery outcomes among young adolescents.青少年早期的分娩结局
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jul;213(1):95.e1-95.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.04.024. Epub 2015 Apr 30.
5
Sonographic large fetal head circumference and risk of cesarean delivery.超声胎儿头围过大与剖宫产的风险。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):339.e1-339.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.230. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
6
Does the presence of learners affect family medicine obstetric outcomes?学习者的存在会影响家庭医学产科结局吗?
Can Fam Physician. 2015 Nov;61(11):e504-8.
7
Obstetric care of women with female genital mutilation attending a specialized clinic in a tertiary center.在三级医疗中心的一家专科诊所接受治疗的女性生殖器切割女性的产科护理。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Feb;132(2):174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.055. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
8
Revisit of risk factors for major obstetric hemorrhage: insights from a large medical center.重大产科出血风险因素的再探讨:来自大型医疗中心的见解
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;292(4):819-28. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3725-y. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
9
Comparison of midwife-led and obstetrician-led care in Lithuania: A retrospective cohort study.立陶宛助产士主导护理与产科医生主导护理的比较:一项回顾性队列研究。
Midwifery. 2018 Oct;65:67-71. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2018.06.017. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
10
Fetal outcome in severe maternal morbidity: too many stillbirths.严重孕产妇发病的胎儿结局:死产过多。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;88(3):343-9. doi: 10.1080/00016340902730318.

引用本文的文献

1
Reduction of Peripartum Racial and Ethnic Disparities: A Conceptual Framework and Maternal Safety Consensus Bundle.减少围产期种族和民族差异:一个概念框架和孕产妇安全共识方案
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2018 May;47(3):275-289. doi: 10.1016/j.jogn.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Apr 24.
2
A mixed methods study of clinical information availability in obstetric triage and prenatal offices.一项关于产科分诊和产前检查科室临床信息可及性的混合方法研究。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Apr 1;24(e1):e87-e94. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocw113.
3
Consolidating CCDs from multiple data sources: a modular approach.
整合来自多个数据源的临床护理数据:一种模块化方法。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Mar;23(2):317-23. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv084. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
4
A qualitative study of gestational weight gain counseling and tracking.一项关于妊娠期体重增加咨询和跟踪的定性研究。
Matern Child Health J. 2013 Oct;17(8):1508-17. doi: 10.1007/s10995-012-1158-9.
5
Missing prenatal records at a birth center: a communication problem quantified.分娩中心产前记录缺失:沟通问题量化分析
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:535-9.
6
Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review.住院临床信息系统成功的决定因素:一项文献综述。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003 May-Jun;10(3):235-43. doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1094. Epub 2003 Jan 28.