Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel; Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Mar;218(3):339.e1-339.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.12.230. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
Persistently high rates of cesarean deliveries are cause for concern for physicians, patients, and health systems. Prelabor assessment might be refined by identifying factors that help predict an individual patient's risk of cesarean delivery. Such factors may contribute to patient safety and satisfaction as well as health system planning and resource allocation. In an earlier study, neonatal head circumference was shown to be more strongly associated with delivery mode and other outcome measures than neonatal birthweight.
In the present study we aimed to evaluate the association of sonographically measured fetal head circumference measured within 1 week of delivery with delivery mode.
This was a multicenter electronic medical record-based study of birth outcomes of primiparous women with term (37-42 weeks) singleton fetuses presenting for ultrasound with fetal biometry within 1 week of delivery. Fetal head circumference and estimated fetal weight were correlated with maternal background, obstetric, and neonatal outcome parameters. Elective cesarean deliveries were excluded. Multinomial regression analysis provided adjusted odds ratios for instrumental delivery and unplanned cesarean delivery when the fetal head circumference was ≥35 cm or estimated fetal weight ≥3900 g, while controlling for possible confounders.
In all, 11,500 cases were collected; 906 elective cesarean deliveries were excluded. A fetal head circumference ≥35 cm increased the risk for unplanned cesarean delivery: 174 fetuses with fetal head circumference ≥35 cm (32%) were delivered by cesarean, vs 1712 (17%) when fetal head circumference <35 cm (odds ratio, 2.49; 95% confidence interval, 2.04-3.03). A fetal head circumference ≥35 cm increased the risk of instrumental delivery (odds ratio, 1.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.88), while estimated fetal weight ≥3900 g tended to reduce it (nonsignificant). Multinomial regression analysis showed that fetal head circumference ≥35 cm increased the risk of unplanned cesarean delivery by an adjusted odds ratio of 1.75 (95% confidence interval, 1.4-2.18) controlling for gestational age, fetal gender, and epidural anesthesia. The rate of prolonged second stage of labor was significantly increased when either the fetal head circumference was ≥35 cm or the estimated fetal weight ≥3900 g, from 22.7% in the total cohort to 31.0%. A fetal head circumference ≥35 cm was associated with a higher rate of 5-minute Apgar score ≤7: 9 (1.7%) vs 63 (0.6%) of infants with fetal head circumference <35 cm (P = .01). The rate among fetuses with an estimated fetal weight ≥3900 g was not significantly increased. The rate of admission to the neonatal intensive care unit did not differ among the groups.
Sonographic fetal head circumference ≥35 cm, measured within 1 week of delivery, is an independent risk factor for unplanned cesarean delivery but not instrumental delivery. Both fetal head circumference ≥35 cm and estimated fetal weight ≥3900 g significantly increased the risk of a prolonged second stage of labor. Fetal head circumference measurement in the last days before delivery may be an important adjunct to estimated fetal weight in labor management.
剖宫产率持续居高不下,引起了医生、患者和医疗体系的关注。通过识别有助于预测个体患者剖宫产风险的因素,可以改进产前评估。这些因素可能有助于提高患者的安全性和满意度,以及医疗体系的规划和资源配置。在早期的一项研究中,新生儿头围与分娩方式和其他结局指标的相关性强于新生儿出生体重。
本研究旨在评估分娩前 1 周内超声测量的胎儿头围与分娩方式的相关性。
这是一项多中心基于电子病历的研究,纳入了足月(37-42 周)单胎初产妇的分娩结局,这些产妇在分娩前 1 周内进行了胎儿生物测量超声检查。胎儿头围和估计胎儿体重与母体背景、产科和新生儿结局参数相关。排除了选择性剖宫产。当胎儿头围≥35 cm 或估计胎儿体重≥3900 g 时,使用多变量回归分析提供了器械分娩和计划性剖宫产的校正比值比,同时控制了可能的混杂因素。
共收集了 11500 例病例;排除了 906 例选择性剖宫产。胎儿头围≥35 cm 增加了计划性剖宫产的风险:174 例胎儿头围≥35 cm(32%)行剖宫产,而 1712 例胎儿头围<35 cm(17%)(比值比,2.49;95%置信区间,2.04-3.03)。胎儿头围≥35 cm 增加了器械分娩的风险(比值比,1.48;95%置信区间,1.16-1.88),而估计胎儿体重≥3900 g 则倾向于降低这种风险(无统计学意义)。多变量回归分析显示,在控制了孕周、胎儿性别和硬膜外麻醉等因素后,胎儿头围≥35 cm 使计划性剖宫产的风险增加了 1.75 倍(95%置信区间,1.4-2.18)。当胎儿头围≥35 cm 或估计胎儿体重≥3900 g 时,第二产程延长的发生率显著增加,从总队列的 22.7%增加到 31.0%。胎儿头围≥35 cm 与 5 分钟 Apgar 评分≤7 的发生率较高相关:9 例(1.7%)与胎儿头围<35 cm 的 63 例(0.6%)(P=0.01)。估计胎儿体重≥3900 g 的发生率没有显著增加。各组新生儿入住新生儿重症监护病房的比例无差异。
分娩前 1 周内超声测量的胎儿头围≥35 cm 是计划性剖宫产的独立危险因素,但不是器械分娩的危险因素。胎儿头围≥35 cm 和估计胎儿体重≥3900 g 均显著增加第二产程延长的风险。在分娩前的最后几天测量胎儿头围可能是分娩管理中估计胎儿体重的重要辅助手段。