Suppr超能文献

生猪养殖的集中化。对生猪健康、生产力、人类健康及环境的影响。

The concentration of swine production. Effects on swine health, productivity, human health, and the environment.

作者信息

Donham K J

机构信息

Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, College of Public Health, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA.

出版信息

Vet Clin North Am Food Anim Pract. 2000 Nov;16(3):559-97. doi: 10.1016/s0749-0720(15)30087-6.

Abstract

The concern about environmental issues centering around CAFOs is appropriate. The veterinary profession can be an important force in meeting these challenges by broadening its scope of knowledge and practice into the broader environmental field. Although animal agriculture's contribution to environmental concerns is the focus of this article, it is only one of several sectors that contributes to environmental degradation. Crop production, as well as livestock production industries, contribute to pollution. Manufacturing industries, municipalities, private individuals, our consumptive lifestyles, and agriculture all contribute to the degradation of our environment. One must keep in mind the huge importance of our agricultural industry and not single it out to the detriment of its progress. We have an abundance of high-quality foods at the lowest cost to the individual of any industrialized nation. We export over 40 billion dollars in agricultural products yearly. Agriculture sustains our rural economies and provides opportunities for over 2 million private enterprises scattered across the country; however, there is a goal that we have a sustainable agriculture. A big part of that depends on development and enhancement of an agriculture that does not pollute, that sustains its farm operators and workers, and that does not make the area residents ill or degrade their quality of life; however, the current situation is not promising. Much remains to be learned about the actual acute and long-term health consequences of animal agricultural pollution. Many health concerns are speculative, even though based on sound facts. We know that many surface waters have excess N and P that leads to eutrophication and possibly enhanced growth of undesirable organisms such as Pfiesteria piscicida. We know that other animal pathogens, such as cryptosporidia, have caused large community outbreaks. There are other potential pathogens, such as Salmonella sp, for which we do not know the hazard. We know that our soils may become excessively laden with P, Cu, and Zn, which retard plant growth and create toxic conditions for grazing animals. There are concerns about air pollution. Odors have negative sensory and physical health consequences. H2S and dust may cause toxic effects on neighbors. NH3 vaporizing from manure sources may be carried with precipitation to cause eutrophication in lakes or altered ecosystems in natural areas. CH4 escaping from degrading manure contributes to greenhouse gases. Workers in confined livestock structures have high risk for a variety of chronic respiratory conditions. They also are at risk for acute poisoning from H2S in operations where liquid manure is stored in confined spaces. There have been numerous health complaints in recent years from community neighbors of large-scale livestock operations. One study showed adverse altered mood states, and another showed evidence of respiratory illness similar to what workers experience. Although it has not been possible to objectively measure conditions and know toxic levels of substances causing these illnesses, there are so-called extratoxic mechanisms, such as inherent aversion to putrefactive odors and exacerbation of preexisting conditions that lower the tolerance threshold. Environmental concerns regarding livestock production are not new. In the early and mid-1970s, there were many conferences and publications regarding odors and water contamination from livestock operations. Although most of what is known in this area has been known for 20 years, relatively little effective efforts have been made to correct the concerns. In fact, trends over this past decade have increased the concerns. This past decade has seen a tremendous acceleration in the concentration and consolidation of agriculture, capping a slow trend over the past 50 years toward larger, fewer, and more-specialized farms. This trend has gone against the old saying that "dilution is the solution to pollution.

摘要

围绕集中式动物饲养场(CAFOs)的环境问题受到关注是恰当的。兽医行业可以通过将其知识和实践范围扩展到更广泛的环境领域,成为应对这些挑战的重要力量。尽管动物农业对环境问题的贡献是本文的重点,但它只是导致环境退化的几个部门之一。作物生产以及畜牧业都会造成污染。制造业、市政当局、个人、我们的消费生活方式以及农业都对我们环境的退化负有责任。必须牢记我们农业产业的巨大重要性,而不应将其单独挑出来,以免损害其发展。在任何工业化国家中,我们以最低的成本为个人提供了丰富的优质食品。我们每年出口超过400亿美元的农产品。农业维持着我们的农村经济,并为遍布全国的200多万家民营企业提供了机会;然而,我们有一个可持续农业的目标。这很大程度上取决于发展和加强一种无污染、能维持农场经营者和工人生计、不会使当地居民生病或降低其生活质量的农业;然而,目前的情况并不乐观。关于动物农业污染实际的急性和长期健康后果,仍有许多有待了解的地方。许多健康问题只是推测性的,尽管是基于可靠的事实。我们知道许多地表水含有过量的氮和磷,这会导致富营养化,并可能促使诸如杀鱼费氏藻等不良生物过度生长。我们知道其他动物病原体,如隐孢子虫,曾引发大规模的社区疫情。还有其他潜在病原体,如沙门氏菌属,我们尚不清楚其危害程度。我们知道我们的土壤可能会积累过多的磷、铜和锌,这会阻碍植物生长,并给放牧动物造成有毒环境。人们还担心空气污染。气味会对感官和身体健康产生负面影响。硫化氢和灰尘可能会对邻居造成毒性影响。从粪便源蒸发的氨气可能会随着降水导致湖泊富营养化或改变自然区域的生态系统。从正在分解的粪便中逸出的甲烷会增加温室气体排放。封闭式牲畜养殖结构中的工人面临多种慢性呼吸道疾病的高风险。在将液体粪便储存在密闭空间的作业中,他们还面临硫化氢急性中毒的风险。近年来,大规模牲畜养殖场的社区邻居提出了大量健康投诉。一项研究显示情绪状态出现不良变化,另一项研究则显示出与工人所经历的类似的呼吸道疾病迹象。尽管目前还无法客观地测量导致这些疾病的物质的状况和毒性水平,但存在所谓的额外毒性机制,例如对腐臭气味的固有厌恶以及使先前存在的状况恶化从而降低耐受阈值。关于畜牧业生产的环境问题并非新鲜事。在20世纪70年代初和中期,就有许多关于畜牧业气味和水污染的会议及出版物。尽管该领域已知的大部分内容已有20年历史,但为解决这些问题所做的有效努力相对较少。事实上,过去十年的趋势加剧了这些担忧。在过去十年中,农业的集中化和整合加速,这是过去50年朝着更大、更少且更专业化农场发展的缓慢趋势的顶点。这种趋势与“稀释是解决污染的办法”这句老话背道而驰。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验