Janovsky M, Tataruch F, Ambuehl M, Giacometti M
Research Institute of Wildlife Ecology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria.
J Wildl Dis. 2000 Oct;36(4):663-9. doi: 10.7589/0090-3558-36.4.663.
Sixty chemical immobilizations of red deer (Cervus elaphus hippelaphus) have been carried out during an etho-ecological study from August 1994 to December 1996 in a 35 ha pen in the district of Nitra (Slovac Republic). Our objective was to determine the efficacy and standard dosages of Zoletil and Rompun for the immobilization of adult red deer in feral conditions as an alternative to the use of the highly toxic opioids. We therefore compared an Immobilon-Rompun combination (ImRo) with a 1:1 mixture of Zoletil and Rompun (ZoRo) as an injectable solution. Use of both combinations led to the immobilization of >92% of deer with an injection volume <3 ml. Mean (SD) dose to achieve immobilization was 35 (14) microg/kg ethorphine + 0.14 (0.056) mg/kg acepromazine + 0.36 (0.14) mg/kg xylazine compared to 1.2 (0.8) mg/kg tiletamine + 1.2 (0.8) mg/kg zolazepam + 2.3 (1.6) mg/kg xylazine. This corresponds to a volume of 1.8 (0.7) ml/100 kg body mass (BM) for ImRo (range = 1.0 to 4.6) and to 2.3 (1.6) ml/100 kg BM for ZoRo (range = 0.7 to 4.0), respectively. Heart rate, respiratory rate and oxyhaemoglobin saturation values did not differ significantly between the two groups during immobilization. Three deer (5%) died during immobilization, but fatalities could not be directly associated with the drug effect. Mean (SD) time from darting to complete immobilization was 5.5 (4.2) min for ImRo and 7.5 (6.1) min for ZoRo, respectively. Differences were not statistically significant. Anesthesia with both combinations of immobilizing agents could be reversed within 2 min using sarmazenile-yohimbine for ZoRo and diprenorphine-yohimbine for ImXy immobilizations, respectively. We conclude that the 1:1 combination of Zoletil and xylazine is a valuable alternative to the use of opioids for the immobilization of adult red deer including feral adult animals.
1994年8月至1996年12月,在斯洛伐克共和国尼特拉区一个35公顷的围栏内进行了一项行为生态学研究,期间对马鹿(Cervus elaphus hippelaphus)进行了60次化学保定。我们的目的是确定佐乐替(Zoletil)和隆朋(Rompun)在野生条件下对成年马鹿进行保定的效果和标准剂量,以替代使用剧毒阿片类药物。因此,我们将一种Immobilon - Rompun组合(ImRo)与佐乐替和隆朋按1:1混合的注射溶液(ZoRo)进行了比较。两种组合的使用均使超过92%的鹿被保定,注射体积<3毫升。达到保定的平均(标准差)剂量为35(14)微克/千克埃托啡 + 0.14(0.056)毫克/千克乙酰丙嗪 + 0.36(0.14)毫克/千克赛拉嗪,而佐乐替组为1.2(0.8)毫克/千克替来他明 + 1.2(0.8)毫克/千克唑拉西泮 + 2.3(1.6)毫克/千克赛拉嗪。这分别对应于ImRo每100千克体重(BM)1.8(0.7)毫升的体积(范围 = 1.0至4.6)和ZoRo每100千克BM 2.3(1.6)毫升的体积(范围 = 0.7至4.0)。保定期间两组的心率、呼吸频率和氧合血红蛋白饱和度值无显著差异。三只鹿(5%)在保定过程中死亡,但死亡不能直接归因于药物作用。从注射到完全保定的平均(标准差)时间,ImRo组为5.5(4.2)分钟,ZoRo组为7.5(6.1)分钟。差异无统计学意义。分别使用沙马唑尼 - 育亨宾和二丙诺啡 - 育亨宾,两种保定剂组合的麻醉作用均可在2分钟内逆转。我们得出结论,佐乐替和赛拉嗪的1:1组合是用于成年马鹿包括野生成年动物保定的阿片类药物的一种有价值的替代品。