Smith M Y, Rapkin B D, Winkel G, Springer C, Chhabra R, Feldman I S
Derald H. Ruttenberg Cancer Center, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2000 Oct;15(10):731-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91003.x.
To examine the impact of housing status on health service utilization patterns in low-income HIV-infected adults.
A survey of 1,445 HIV-infected Medicaid recipients in New York State between April 1996 and March 1997.
Six percent of study participants were homeless, 24.5% were "doubled-up," and 69.5% were stably housed. Compared with the stably housed, doubled-up and homeless participants were less likely to be seeing a physician regularly (P = .0001), and if seeing a physician, they were likely to have been doing so for a significantly shorter time (P = .02). The homeless were also less likely than either stably housed or doubled-up individuals to see the same physician or group of physicians at each ambulatory visit (P = .007). In addition, a higher proportion of the homeless had made one or more hospital visits over the prior 3 months than the nonhomeless. After multivariate adjustment, doubled-up participants were found to make more emergency room visits, the homeless were less likely to be taking prophylaxis for Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia, and both the doubled-up and the homeless were shown to use slightly more outpatient care than the stably housed.
Our study documents differences in health care utilization patterns across stably housed, doubled-up, and homeless HIV-infected persons after controlling for health insurance coverage. These differences, especially those pertaining to outpatient services, suggest that the unstably housed may be receiving less adequate health care than the stably housed, and hence may be more likely to experience adverse clinical outcomes.
探讨住房状况对低收入HIV感染成年人医疗服务利用模式的影响。
对1996年4月至1997年3月期间纽约州1445名接受医疗补助的HIV感染者进行调查。
6%的研究参与者无家可归,24.5%的人“合住”,69.5%的人有稳定住所。与有稳定住所的人相比,合住和无家可归的参与者定期看医生的可能性较小(P = 0.0001),而且如果看医生,他们看诊的时间可能明显较短(P = 0.02)。无家可归者在每次门诊就诊时看同一位医生或同一组医生的可能性也低于有稳定住所或合住的人(P = 0.007)。此外,在过去3个月中,无家可归者进行一次或多次住院治疗的比例高于非无家可归者。经过多变量调整后,发现合住的参与者急诊就诊次数更多,无家可归者接受卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎预防治疗的可能性较小,合住者和无家可归者使用的门诊护理均略多于有稳定住所的人。
我们的研究记录了在控制医疗保险覆盖范围后,有稳定住所、合住和无家可归的HIV感染者在医疗服务利用模式上的差异。这些差异,尤其是与门诊服务相关的差异,表明居住不稳定的人可能比居住稳定的人获得的医疗保健不足,因此可能更有可能出现不良临床结局。