Suppr超能文献

膝关节手术后关节内及硬膜外注射新斯的明用于术后镇痛

Postoperative analgesia by intraarticular and epidural neostigmine following knee surgery.

作者信息

Lauretti G R, de Oliveira R, Perez M V, Paccola C A

机构信息

Center for Pain Therapy, Hospital das Clínicas, Department of Surgery, Orthopedics and Traumatology, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto-USP, Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

J Clin Anesth. 2000 Sep;12(6):444-8. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(00)00189-6.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To define the analgesic efficacy, and to identify a possible site of action, of epidural and intraarticular neostigmine.

DESIGN

Randomized, double-blind study.

SETTING

Postoperative analgesia, teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

58 ASA physical status I and II patients undergoing knee surgery.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients were premedicated with 0.05 to 0.1 mg/kg intravenous midazolam and received combined epidural/intrathecal technique. Intrathecal anesthesia consisted of 20 mg bupivacaine. A 10 mL epidural and intraarticular injection was administered to all patients; this consisted of either the study drug or normal saline. Postoperatively, pain was assessed using the 10 cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and intramuscular (IM) 75 mg diclofenac was available at patient request. The control group (CG) received both epidural and intraarticular saline. The 1 microg/kg epidural group (1 microg/kg EG) received epidural neostigmine and intraarticular saline. The 1 microg/kg intraarticular group (1 microg/kg AG) received epidural saline and intraarticular neostigmine. Finally, the 500 microg intraarticular group (500 microg AG) received epidural saline and intraarticular neostigmine.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

56 patients were evaluated. Groups were demographically the same and did not differ in intraoperative characteristics. The VAS score at first rescue analgesic and the incidence of adverse effects were similar among groups (p< 0.05). The time (min) to first rescue analgesic was shorter for both the CG (228+/-54) and 1 microg/kg AG (251+/-87) groups compared to the 1 microg/kg EG (333+/-78) and 500 microg AG (335+/- 111) groups (p<0.05). The analgesic consumption (number of IM diclofenac injections (mean [25(th)-75(th) percentile]) in 24 hours was higher in the CG group than both the 1 microg/kg EG and 500 microg AG groups (p<0.05). The overall 24-hour pain VAS score (cm) was higher in the CG group than in the 1 microg/kg EG (p<0.05) group.

CONCLUSION

Although peripheral neostigmine 1 microg/kg did not result in postoperative analgesia, the same dose applied epidurally resulted in over 5 hours of analgesia, similar to a fivefold dose applied peripherally. The results suggest that epidural neostigmine has a greater analgesic efficacy than peripherally applied neostigmine.

摘要

研究目的

确定硬膜外和关节腔内新斯的明的镇痛效果,并确定其可能的作用部位。

设计

随机双盲研究。

地点

教学医院的术后镇痛。

患者

58例美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)身体状况为I级和II级的膝关节手术患者。

干预措施

所有患者术前静脉注射0.05至0.1mg/kg咪达唑仑进行预处理,并采用联合硬膜外/鞘内技术。鞘内麻醉采用20mg布比卡因。所有患者均接受10mL硬膜外和关节腔内注射;注射药物为研究药物或生理盐水。术后,使用10cm视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评估疼痛,患者如有需要可肌肉注射(IM)75mg双氯芬酸。对照组(CG)接受硬膜外和关节腔内生理盐水注射。1μg/kg硬膜外组(1μg/kg EG)接受硬膜外新斯的明和关节腔内生理盐水注射。1μg/kg关节腔内组(1μg/kg AG)接受硬膜外生理盐水和关节腔内新斯的明注射。最后,500μg关节腔内组(500μg AG)接受硬膜外生理盐水和关节腔内新斯的明注射。

测量指标及主要结果

对56例患者进行了评估。各组在人口统计学特征上相同,术中特征也无差异。首次补救镇痛时的VAS评分及不良反应发生率在各组间相似(p<0.05)。与1μg/kg EG组(333±78)和500μg AG组组(335±111)相比,CG组(228±54)和1μg/kg AG组(251±87)首次补救镇痛的时间(分钟)更短(p<0.05)。CG组24小时内的镇痛药物消耗量(IM双氯芬酸注射次数(平均值[第25 - 75百分位数]))高于1μg/kg EG组和500μg AG组(p<0.05)。CG组24小时总体疼痛VAS评分(cm)高于1μg/kg EG组(p<0.05)。

结论

尽管关节腔内注射1μg/kg新斯的明未产生术后镇痛效果,但硬膜外注射相同剂量可产生超过5小时的镇痛效果,类似于关节腔内注射五倍剂量的效果。结果表明,硬膜外新斯的明的镇痛效果优于关节腔内注射新斯的明。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验