Lauretti G R, Gomes J M, Reis M P, Pereira N L
Department of Surgery, Orthopedics and Traumatology, Hospital das Clinicas, Faculty of Medicine of Ribeirao Preto, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
J Clin Anesth. 1999 Dec;11(8):663-8. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(99)00122-1.
To examine analgesia and adverse effects of combination epidural pain therapy consisting of administration of morphine with either low dose of ketamine, neostigmine, or midazolam in terminal cancer pain patients.
Randomized double-blind study.
Teaching hospital.
48 terminal cancer patients suffering from chronic pain.
Patients were randomized to one of four groups (n = 12). The concept of visual analog scale (VAS), which consisted of a 10-cm line with 0 equaling "no pain at all" and 10 equaling "the worst possible pain" was introduced. All patients were taking oral amitriptyline 50 mg at bedtime. Pain was initially treated with epidural morphine 2 mg twice daily (12-hr intervals) to maintain the VAS below 4/10. Afterwards, VAS scores > or = 4/10 at any time were treated by adding the epidural study drug (2 ml), which was administered each morning, just after the 2-mg epidural morphine administration. The control group (CG) received 2 mg of epidural morphine (2 ml). The ketamine group (KG) received 0.2 mg/kg epidural ketamine (2 ml). The neostigmine group (NG) received 100 micrograms epidural neostigmine (2 ml). The midazolam group (MG) received 500 micrograms epidural midazolam (2 ml). Patients received the study drugs on a daily basis.
Duration of effective analgesia was measured as time from the study drug administration to the first patient's VAS score > or = 4/10 recorded in days. The groups were demographically the same. The VAS pain scores prior to the treatment were also similar among groups. Only the patients in the KG demonstrated lower VAS scores compared to the MG (p = 0.018). Time since the epidural study drug administration until patient complaint of pain VAS > or = 4/10 was higher for both the KG and NG compared to the CG (KG > CG, p = 0.049; NG > CG; p = 0.0163). Only the KG used less epidural morphine compared to the CG during the period of study (25 days) (p = 0.003).
The association of either low-dose epidural ketamine or neostigmine (but not midazolam) to epidural morphine increased the duration of analgesia in the population studied (gt;20 days) compared to the CG and MG (8 to 10 days) when administered in the early stages of terminal cancer pain therapy, without increasing the incidence of adverse effects.
探讨在晚期癌症疼痛患者中,吗啡联合小剂量氯胺酮、新斯的明或咪达唑仑进行硬膜外疼痛治疗的镇痛效果及不良反应。
随机双盲研究。
教学医院。
48例患有慢性疼痛的晚期癌症患者。
患者被随机分为四组(n = 12)。引入视觉模拟量表(VAS)的概念,该量表由一条10厘米长的线组成,0表示“完全无痛”,10表示“可能的最严重疼痛”。所有患者每晚口服50毫克阿米替林。疼痛最初用硬膜外吗啡2毫克每日两次(间隔12小时)治疗,以将VAS维持在4/10以下。此后,任何时候VAS评分≥4/10时,通过添加硬膜外研究药物(2毫升)进行治疗,该药物在每天早上2毫克硬膜外吗啡给药后立即给予。对照组(CG)接受2毫克硬膜外吗啡(2毫升)。氯胺酮组(KG)接受0.2毫克/千克硬膜外氯胺酮(2毫升)。新斯的明组(NG)接受100微克硬膜外新斯的明(2毫升)。咪达唑仑组(MG)接受500微克硬膜外咪达唑仑(2毫升)。患者每天接受研究药物。
有效镇痛持续时间以从研究药物给药到首次记录患者VAS评分≥4/10的天数来衡量。各组在人口统计学上相同。治疗前各组的VAS疼痛评分也相似。与MG相比,只有KG组的VAS评分较低(p = 0.018)。与CG相比,KG组和NG组从硬膜外研究药物给药到患者主诉疼痛VAS≥4/10的时间更长(KG > CG,p = 0.049;NG > CG;p = 0.0163)。在研究期间(25天),只有KG组与CG组相比使用较少的硬膜外吗啡(p = 0.003)。
在晚期癌症疼痛治疗的早期阶段,与CG组和MG组(8至10天)相比,硬膜外吗啡联合小剂量硬膜外氯胺酮或新斯的明(而非咪达唑仑)可增加所研究人群(>20天)的镇痛持续时间,且不增加不良反应的发生率。