Shear P K, Wells C T, Brock A M
Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45211-0376, USA.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2000 Oct;22(5):649-55. doi: 10.1076/1380-3395(200010)22:5;1-9;FT649.
The California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT) is a widely used measure of verbal learning and memory; however, there is little empirical evidence about the effects of the administration procedure on the test results. The primary goal of this study was to examine the effect of the semantic cuing condition on subsequent free recall of the material. A secondary goal was to assess whether prior knowledge that the words on the list are drawn from four semantic categories would enhance recall. Participants were 154 young healthy adults. The results suggested that participants who received semantic cuing according to the standardized test instructions generated the same number of correct words on the delayed free recall of the list as did those who did not receive cuing. Cuing did, however, lead participants to use greater semantic clustering in their delayed recall of the list. Participants who were provided with information prior to learning about the semantic structure of the test did not show enhanced learning relative to those who did not receive this information. We conclude that semantic cuing on the CVLT does not substantially enhance delayed recall of the material in healthy participants, although it is quite possible that cuing would have a greater effect in patients who have poor semantic organizational skills.
加利福尼亚言语学习测验(CVLT)是一种广泛使用的言语学习和记忆测量工具;然而,关于施测程序对测试结果影响的实证证据很少。本研究的主要目的是检验语义线索条件对随后材料自由回忆的影响。次要目的是评估事先知道列表中的单词来自四个语义类别是否会增强回忆。参与者为154名年轻健康成年人。结果表明,根据标准化测试说明接受语义线索提示的参与者在对列表的延迟自由回忆中产生的正确单词数量与未接受线索提示的参与者相同。然而,线索提示确实导致参与者在对列表的延迟回忆中使用了更多的语义聚类。在学习前被告知测试语义结构信息的参与者相对于未收到此信息的参与者而言,学习效果并未增强。我们得出结论,尽管线索提示很可能对语义组织能力较差的患者有更大影响,但CVLT上的语义线索提示并不能显著增强健康参与者对材料的延迟回忆。