Informed consent and research design in critical care medicine.
作者信息
Truog RD
机构信息
Associate Professor, Anesthesia and Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School and Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Unit, Children's Hospital, Farley, Boston, MA 02115, USA. Tel: 617 355 7327.
出版信息
Crit Care. 1999;3(3):R29-R33. doi: 10.1186/cc347.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Informed consent and research design in critical care medicine.重症医学中的知情同意与研究设计。
Crit Care. 1999;3(3):R29-R33. doi: 10.1186/cc347.
2
Deferred proxy consent in emergency critical care research: ethically valid and practically feasible.急诊重症监护研究中的延迟代理同意：伦理上有效且实际可行。
Crit Care Med. 2009 Jan;37(1 Suppl):S65-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181920851.
3
A computer-based education intervention to enhance surrogates' informed consent for genomics research.一种基于计算机的教育干预措施，以提高替代者对基因组学研究的知情同意程度。
Am J Crit Care. 2015 Mar;24(2):148-55. doi: 10.4037/ajcc2015983.
4
Enhancing the informed consent process for critical care research: strategies from a thromboprophylaxis trial.强化重症监护研究中的知情同意过程：一项血栓预防治疗试验的策略。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2013 Dec;29(6):300-9. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2013.04.006. Epub 2013 Jul 18.
5
Informed consent in the nuclear medicine setting.核医学环境中的知情同意。
J Nucl Med Technol. 2011 Mar;39(1):1-4. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.110.083931. Epub 2011 Feb 14.
6
Critical care research and informed consent.
North Carol Law Rev. 1996 Nov;75(1):205-71.
7
Informed consent for medical treatment and research: a review.医疗治疗与研究中的知情同意：综述
Oncologist. 2005 Sep;10(8):636-41. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.10-8-636.
8
Ethical and regulatory challenges associated with the exception from informed consent requirements for emergency research: from experimental design to institutional review board approval.与紧急研究知情同意要求豁免相关的伦理和监管挑战：从实验设计到机构审查委员会批准。
Arch Surg. 2006 Oct;141(10):1019-23; discussion 1024. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.141.10.1019.
9
Informed consent in rheumatology care practice.风湿病护理实践中的知情同意。
Rev Bras Reumatol. 2011 Mar-Apr;51(2):179-83.
10
Confronting the ethical challenges to informed consent in emergency medicine research.应对急诊医学研究中知情同意面临的伦理挑战。
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Oct;11(10):1082-9. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.05.028.
引用本文的文献
1
Epidemiological Assessment and Inference in Race-Based Clinical Algorithms: A Narrative Review and Health Policy Analysis Focused on Living Kidney Donation.基于种族的临床算法中的流行病学评估与推断：以活体肾移植为重点的叙述性综述与卫生政策分析
Health Equity. 2025 Mar 11;9(1):161-169. doi: 10.1089/heq.2024.0170. eCollection 2025.
2
Ethics in extracorporeal life support: a narrative review.体外生命支持中的伦理学：叙事性综述。
Crit Care. 2021 Jul 21;25(1):256. doi: 10.1186/s13054-021-03689-0.
3
The 50 most cited papers in chronic scapholunate reconstruction: a bibliometric analysis.50 篇最具引用价值的慢性舟月骨周围脱位重建文献：文献计量学分析。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2021 Aug;31(6):995-1004. doi: 10.1007/s00590-020-02864-3. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
4
Exploring obstacles to critical care trials in the UK: A qualitative investigation.探索英国重症监护试验的障碍：一项定性研究。
J Intensive Care Soc. 2017 Feb;18(1):36-46. doi: 10.1177/1751143716663749. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
5
Informed consent in paediatric critical care research--a South African perspective.儿科重症监护研究中的知情同意——南非视角
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Sep 9;16:62. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0052-6.
6
Clinical equipoise and personal equipoise: two necessary ingredients for reducing bias in manual therapy trials.临床 equipoise 和个人 equipoise：减少手法治疗试验偏差的两个必要因素。
J Man Manip Ther. 2011 Feb;19(1):55-7. doi: 10.1179/106698111X12899036752014.
7
New regulations for the care of the critically ill patients in Italy.
Intensive Care Med. 2004 Aug;30(8):1660-1. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2343-0. Epub 2004 Jun 15.
本文引用的文献
1
Ethics and statistics in randomized clinical trials.随机临床试验中的伦理与统计学
Stat Sci. 1991;6(1):52-88. doi: 10.1214/ss/1177011934.
2
Was the UK collaborative ECMO trial ethical?
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1997 Jul;11(3):264-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1997.tb00003.x.
3
Ethics and practice: alternative designs for phase III randomized clinical trials.伦理与实践：III期随机临床试验的替代设计
Control Clin Trials. 1999 Apr;20(2):172-86. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(98)00056-7.
4
Zelen randomization: attitudes of parents participating in a neonatal clinical trial.泽伦随机分组法：参与新生儿临床试验的家长的态度
Control Clin Trials. 1999 Apr;20(2):149-71. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(98)00049-x.
5
Protection of human subjects; informed consent--FDA. Final rule.保护人类受试者；知情同意——美国食品药品监督管理局。最终规则。
Fed Regist. 1996 Oct 2;61(192):51498-533.
6
Emergency informed consent.
Anesthesiology. 1998 Nov;89(5):1047-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199811000-00002.
7
Reactions of participants to the results of a randomised controlled trial: exploratory study.参与者对随机对照试验结果的反应：探索性研究。
BMJ. 1998 Jul 4;317(7150):21-6. doi: 10.1136/bmj.317.7150.21.
8
Fifty years later: the significance of the Nuremberg Code.五十年后：《纽伦堡法典》的意义
N Engl J Med. 1997 Nov 13;337(20):1436-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199711133372006.
9
Making sense of randomization; responses of parents of critically ill babies to random allocation of treatment in a clinical trial.理解随机分组；重症婴儿父母对临床试验中治疗随机分配的反应。
Soc Sci Med. 1997 Nov;45(9):1337-55. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(97)00063-4.
10
The European convention on bioethics.《欧洲生物伦理公约》
Hastings Cent Rep. 1997 Jan-Feb;27(1):13-23.
Zotero 插件