• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

护理人员对尸检的态度。

Attitudes of nursing staff to the autopsy.

作者信息

Dziobon M D, Roberts I S, Benbow E W

机构信息

University of Manchester, England.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):969-74.

PMID:11095237
Abstract

We assessed the views of hospital nurses on the autopsy, using a questionnaire which was distributed by hand to all qualified nurses working at Manchester Royal Infirmary during a 48-h period. We found that many respondents (43%) had had occasion to discuss autopsy with relatives, and the majority (90%) would like to learn more about counselling the bereaved. Few (15%) clearly understood the legal distinction between coroners' and hospital autopsies. Almost all (97%) thought the main reason for autopsy was determination of the cause of death, and only 12% supported a role in clinical audit. More respondents saw benefits for doctors rather than for nurses, and only 56% perceived a benefit for relatives. In general, nursing staff have a more positive view of the autopsy than we anticipated, and we would advocate making more information about the benefits of autopsy available to nurses.

摘要

我们通过问卷调查评估了医院护士对尸检的看法,该问卷在48小时内亲手分发给了曼彻斯特皇家医院所有符合条件的护士。我们发现,许多受访者(43%)曾有机会与亲属讨论尸检,且大多数人(90%)希望更多地了解如何为逝者家属提供咨询。很少有人(15%)清楚地理解验尸官尸检与医院尸检在法律上的区别。几乎所有人(97%)认为尸检的主要原因是确定死因,只有12%的人支持尸检在临床审计中的作用。更多的受访者认为尸检对医生而非护士有益,只有56%的人认为对亲属有益。总体而言,护理人员对尸检的看法比我们预期的更为积极,我们主张向护士提供更多关于尸检益处的信息。

相似文献

1
Attitudes of nursing staff to the autopsy.护理人员对尸检的态度。
J Adv Nurs. 2000 Oct;32(4):969-74.
2
Investigating factors associate to nurses' attitudes towards perinatal bereavement care.调查与护士对围产期丧亲护理态度相关的因素。
J Clin Nurs. 2008 Feb;17(4):509-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02007.x.
3
Fit for practice? An exploration of the development of newly qualified nurses using focus groups.适合实践吗?通过焦点小组对新入职护士发展情况的探索。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2007 Sep;44(7):1210-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.05.010. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
4
Care of the bereaved when postmortems are required.在需要进行尸检时对逝者家属的关怀。
Nurs Times. 2004;100(36):32-3.
5
The lived experiences of newly qualified nurses on clinical placement during the first six months following registration in the Republic of Ireland.爱尔兰共和国新获得资格的护士在注册后前六个月临床实习期间的生活经历。
J Clin Nurs. 2007 Aug;16(8):1534-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01794.x.
6
Palliative care nursing. Part 2. Addressing bereavement issues through education.姑息护理。第2部分。通过教育解决丧亲问题。
Nurs Times. 2002;98(42):36-7.
7
Everyday death: how do nurses cope with caring for dying people in hospital?日常死亡:护士如何应对在医院照顾临终患者?
Int J Nurs Stud. 2005 Feb;42(2):125-33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.06.004.
8
Nurses' experience of collaboration with relatives of frail elderly patients in acute hospital wards: a qualitative study.急性医院病房中护士与体弱老年患者亲属合作的经验:一项定性研究。
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 May;45(5):668-81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.01.010. Epub 2007 Mar 23.
9
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG): the role and perspective of nurses.经皮内镜下胃造口术(PEG):护士的角色与展望
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Feb;14(2):187-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01044.x.
10
Interacting with relatives in intensive care unit. Nurses' perceptions of a challenging task.在重症监护病房与亲属互动。护士对一项具有挑战性任务的看法。
Nurs Crit Care. 2009 Sep-Oct;14(5):264-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-5153.2009.00347.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Do we need dissection in an integrated problem-based learning medical course? Perceptions of first- and second-year students.在以问题为基础的医学综合课程中我们需要解剖学吗?一年级和二年级学生的看法。
Surg Radiol Anat. 2007 Mar;29(2):173-80. doi: 10.1007/s00276-007-0180-x. Epub 2007 Feb 21.
2
Perinatal pathology in the context of a clinical trial: a review of the literature.临床试验背景下的围产期病理学:文献综述
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2004 May;89(3):F200-3. doi: 10.1136/adc.2002.012740.