Uhm JH, Yung WK
Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Curr Treat Options Neurol. 1999 Nov;1(5):428-437. doi: 10.1007/s11940-996-0006-x.
Although progress in cancer research is paralleled by the discovery and development of novel chemotherapeutic agents, the benefits of these agents are offset by their side-effect profiles. Of the numerous adverse effects associated with antineoplastic drugs, peripheral neuropathy is the most frequent and is often debilitating. This article reviews the treatment options--both primary and secondary--for neuropathic complications of cancer therapy. Before a potentially neurotoxic chemotherapeutic regimen is started, patients should undergo 1) a baseline neurologic history for possible coexisting risk factors for neuropathy; 2) physical evaluation; and 3) if indicated, electrophysiologic testing, including nerve conduction studies and electromyography. Patients should be followed closely for the development of neuropathic signs and symptoms. When symptoms (eg, paresthesias or pain) or deficits (eg, weakness) develop, their severity and their effect on quality of life will determine whether the neurotoxic chemotherapy should be continued at a lower dose or discontinued. Neuropathic pain should be treated aggressively with a stepwise approach. The decision to initiate therapy should be guided first by the severity of pain and second by the convenience of dosing and the side-effect profile of the medication. Specific antineuropathic pain therapy may begin with a tricyclic antidepressant (TCA), titrated to 100 to 150 mg/d, unless anticholinergic side effects appear before this dosage is reached. The TCA may be replaced by or supplemented with antiepileptic agents, such as gabapentin, which is attractive because of its rapid dose titration (maximum, 3600 mg/d) and minimal interaction with other medications. In addition to pharmacologic therapies targeting symptom management, new therapies directed at preventing the onset or progression of neurotoxicity are desperately needed.
尽管癌症研究的进展伴随着新型化疗药物的发现和开发,但这些药物的益处被其副作用所抵消。在与抗肿瘤药物相关的众多不良反应中,周围神经病变最为常见,且常常使人衰弱。本文综述了癌症治疗所致神经病变并发症的主要和次要治疗选择。在开始可能具有神经毒性的化疗方案之前,患者应进行以下检查:1)详细询问神经病史,以排查可能存在的神经病变共存危险因素;2)进行体格检查;3)如有必要,进行电生理检查,包括神经传导研究和肌电图检查。应密切关注患者是否出现神经病变的体征和症状。当出现症状(如感觉异常或疼痛)或功能缺损(如无力)时,其严重程度及其对生活质量的影响将决定是否应降低神经毒性化疗药物的剂量继续治疗或停药。对于神经性疼痛,应采用逐步治疗的方法积极治疗。开始治疗的决策应首先依据疼痛的严重程度,其次考虑给药的便利性和药物的副作用。特异性抗神经性疼痛治疗可首先选用三环类抗抑郁药(TCA),滴定至100至150毫克/天,除非在达到此剂量之前出现抗胆碱能副作用。TCA可被抗癫痫药物替代或补充,如加巴喷丁,因其剂量滴定迅速(最大剂量为3600毫克/天)且与其他药物相互作用最小而具有吸引力。除了针对症状管理的药物治疗外,迫切需要针对预防神经毒性发作或进展的新疗法。