Deng Liting, Lee Wan-Hung, Xu Zhili, Makriyannis Alexandros, Hohmann Andrea G
Program in Neuroscience, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA; Interdisciplinary Biochemistry Graduate Program, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Interdisciplinary Biochemistry Graduate Program, Department of Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.
Pharmacol Res. 2016 Dec;114:75-89. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2016.10.007. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
Neuropathic pain impacts approximately 3-4.5% of the global population and remains an unresolved health problem. The management of neuropathic pain has two distinct goals-prevention of development and control of established neuropathic pain. We examined the impact of both prophylactic and therapeutic treatments with the tricyclic antidepressant desipramine on the development and maintenance of toxic neuropathic pain induced by the chemotherapeutic agent paclitaxel. We also investigated the involvement of endogenous analgesic (i.e., endogenous opioid and endocannabinoid) systems in the antinociceptive actions of desipramine in these two distinct phases of neuropathic pain. Chronic subcutaneous infusion of desipramine via osmotic pumps suppressed both the development and maintenance of paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain. However, only prophylactic desipramine treatment blocked the development of neuropathic pain throughout the three month observation interval; neuropathic pain did not return. The opioid receptor antagonist naloxone blocked the antinociceptive effects of both prophylactic and therapeutic desipramine treatments throughout the entire timecourse of desipramine-induced antinociception. By contrast, cannabinoid CB and CB receptor antagonists partially attenuated the antinociceptive actions of desipramine in a manner that was restricted to the development phase of paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain only. Paclitaxel decreased cell viability in TMD231 tumor cells in an MTT assay in vitro. Notably, desipramine (1nM-1μM) alone did not alter tumor cell viability and did not prevent the cytotoxic effects of paclitaxel under identical conditions. The highest concentration of desipramine (10μM) reduced tumor cell viability alone and enhanced the cytotoxic effects of paclitaxel. Our study identifies a previously unrecognized preemptive analgesic strategy that prevents development of paclitaxel-induced neuropathic pain, and also dissects receptor mechanisms underlying desipramine-induced antinociceptive effects. This information may be applied to improve current therapeutic strategies with the goal of preventing and managing neuropathic pain induced by chemotherapeutic treatment.
神经性疼痛影响着全球约3%至4.5%的人口,仍是一个尚未解决的健康问题。神经性疼痛的管理有两个不同的目标——预防其发展和控制已形成的神经性疼痛。我们研究了三环类抗抑郁药地昔帕明的预防性和治疗性治疗对化疗药物紫杉醇诱导的毒性神经性疼痛的发展和维持的影响。我们还研究了内源性镇痛系统(即内源性阿片类和内源性大麻素系统)在这两个不同阶段的神经性疼痛中地昔帕明的抗伤害感受作用中的参与情况。通过渗透泵慢性皮下输注地昔帕明可抑制紫杉醇诱导的神经性疼痛的发展和维持。然而,只有预防性地昔帕明治疗在整个三个月的观察期内阻止了神经性疼痛的发展;神经性疼痛没有复发。阿片受体拮抗剂纳洛酮在整个地昔帕明诱导的抗伤害感受过程中阻断了预防性和治疗性地昔帕明治疗的抗伤害感受作用。相比之下,大麻素CB1和CB2受体拮抗剂仅在紫杉醇诱导的神经性疼痛的发展阶段以一种受限的方式部分减弱了地昔帕明的抗伤害感受作用。在体外MTT试验中,紫杉醇降低了TMD231肿瘤细胞的活力。值得注意的是,单独使用地昔帕明(1nM - 1μM)不会改变肿瘤细胞活力,并且在相同条件下不会阻止紫杉醇的细胞毒性作用。地昔帕明的最高浓度(10μM)单独降低了肿瘤细胞活力并增强了紫杉醇的细胞毒性作用。我们的研究确定了一种先前未被认识的抢先镇痛策略,该策略可预防紫杉醇诱导的神经性疼痛的发展,并且还剖析了地昔帕明诱导的抗伤害感受作用的受体机制。这些信息可用于改进当前的治疗策略,以预防和管理化疗治疗引起的神经性疼痛。