Niemann J T, Cruz B, Garner D, Lewis R J
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California-Los Angeles School of Medicine, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, CA, USA.
Ann Emerg Med. 2000 Dec;36(6):543-6. doi: 10.1067/mem.2000.109441.
Prior laboratory and clinical studies demonstrate that cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) preceding countershock of prolonged ventricular fibrillation (VF) increases the likelihood of successful cardiac resuscitation. The lower limit of VF duration at which time preshock CPR provides no benefit has not been specifically studied. The purpose of this study was to compare countershock and cardiac resuscitation outcome between immediate countershock of VF of 5-minute duration and CPR without drug therapy before countershock in a swine model.
VF was induced in anesthetized and instrumented swine. After 5 minutes of VF, animals received 1 of 2 treatments. Animals in group 1, a "historical" control group (n=20), received immediate countershock followed by CPR and repeated shocks if needed. Group 2 animals (n=11) received CPR for 90 seconds preceding countershock, then continued CPR and repeated countershock if necessary. Drugs were not administered to either group, and resuscitation efforts were discontinued if a perfusing rhythm was not restored within 10 minutes of the first countershock. First shock success rate (defined as termination of VF), the number of shocks required to terminate VF, and the cardiac resuscitation rate were compared between groups.
The first shock terminated VF in 13 of 20 group 1 animals and 2 of 11 group 2 animals (P =.023). All but 1 animal in group 1 developed pulseless electrical activity after countershock. All but 1 animal in group 1 were eventually successfully resuscitated with CPR and repeated shocks if necessary. Four group 2 animals could not be resuscitated (P =.042).
Although effective in improving outcome of prolonged VF, CPR preceding countershock of VF of 5-minute duration does not improve the response to the first shock, decrease the incidence of postshock pulseless electrical activity, or the rate of return of circulation. In this study, CPR preceding countershock resulted in a significantly lower cardiac resuscitation rate.
先前的实验室和临床研究表明,在长时间心室颤动(VF)电击除颤前进行心肺复苏(CPR)可增加心脏复苏成功的可能性。尚未对电击前CPR无益处时VF持续时间的下限进行专门研究。本研究的目的是在猪模型中比较持续5分钟VF的即刻电击除颤与电击前未使用药物治疗的CPR之间的电击除颤和心脏复苏结果。
在麻醉并植入仪器的猪身上诱发VF。VF持续5分钟后,动物接受两种治疗中的一种。第1组为“历史”对照组(n = 20),接受即刻电击除颤,随后进行CPR,必要时重复电击。第2组动物(n = 11)在电击除颤前接受90秒的CPR,然后继续CPR,必要时重复电击。两组均未使用药物,若在首次电击除颤后10分钟内未恢复灌注心律,则停止复苏努力。比较两组的首次电击成功率(定义为VF终止)、终止VF所需的电击次数和心脏复苏率。
第1组20只动物中有13只、第2组11只动物中有2只首次电击终止了VF(P = 0.023)。第1组除1只动物外,其余动物在电击除颤后均出现无脉电活动。第1组除1只动物外,其余动物最终通过CPR及必要时的重复电击均成功复苏。第2组有4只动物未能复苏(P = 0.042)。
尽管CPR对改善长时间VF的结果有效,但在持续5分钟VF电击除颤前进行CPR并不能改善对首次电击的反应、降低电击后无脉电活动的发生率或循环恢复率。在本研究中,电击除颤前进行CPR导致心脏复苏率显著降低。